comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Supreme court constitution bench - Page 5 : comparemela.com

Aligarh Muslim University Case | Historic Antecedents Of Institute Must Be Seen To Assess Minority Status, AMU Tells Supreme Court [Day 1]

The Supreme Court s Constitution Bench of 7 judges headed by the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud on Tuesday (January 9) began the hearing of a batch of connected matters on the issue of.

State of keralaUttar pradeshS azeez bashaManoj misraSanjiv khannaRajeev dhavanJustice jagannath shettyJustice khannaSurya kantRanjan gogoiDipankar dattaAzeez bashaUniversity of delhiCourt observation onAllahabad high courtAligarh muslim university

What Is Bilkis Bano Case and What Did Supreme Court Order?

What Is Bilkis Bano Case and What Did Supreme Court Order?
kashmirlife.net - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from kashmirlife.net Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

State of haryanaBilkis banoHarish salveLala vakilRadheshyam bhagwandas shahAzadi ka amrit mahotsavSujata manoharGursimran kaur bakshiVikram nathUjjal bhuyanSupreme courtSupreme court bench of justices ajay rastogiCentral bureau of investigationSupreme court constitution benchBombay high courtGujarat high court

Regulation by statute not a bar on institute enjoying minority status: Supreme Court in AMU case

The Supreme Court orally observed that an institute is not barred from enjoying minority status only because it is regulated by a statute, while hearing a case concerning the minority status of the AMU.

Uttar pradeshS azeez bashaSatish chandra sharmaRanjan gogoiDipankar dattaSurya kantManoj misraSanjiv khannaAzeez bashaTushar mehtaSupreme courtCentral universityUnion of indiaAllahabad high courtAligarh muslim universityConstitution bench

Dissenting view in SC s Article 370 order would have helped understand case better: Nariman at Justice Sunanda Bhandare Lecture | India News

“An American judge had once said that ‘a dissent may salvage for tomorrow’, a legal principle that has been omitted or forgotten today,” Nariman said.

United statesJusticebv nagarathnaJustice sunanda bhandareSupreme courtJustice sunanda bhandare memorial lectureIndian womenFalis narimanFali narimanUstice sunanda bhandare lectureSupreme court constitution benchNdian express newsUrrent affairs

Supreme Court Monthly Round-Up: December 2023

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 1026 To 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 1071Dr. Premchandran Keezhoth v The Chancellor Kannur University 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 1025Pavnesh Kumar v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (SC).

Uttar pradeshState of manipurTamil naduState of west bengalWest bengalState of chhattisgarhJammu and kashmirState of rajasthanState of keralaMadhya pradeshCzech republicState of jharkhandState of odishaState of andhra pradeshAndhra pradeshState of haryana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.