major challenge at the border, especially in el paso and on the rio grande valley. this gives the administration some time. the hearings from the supreme court aren t going to take place until february. we may not have a ruling until the spring of 2023. in an ideal world the white house will be tougher on border security. get its coalition partners on board and not have the political crisis that was looking like a really urgent issue right now. rich: trying to navigate two sides of his own party here. the more liberal wing we need a policy of consequences for those who are return to mexico or their country of origin under current law there is a five year ban on requesting asylum. for those who are returned because they did not follow the law. we need this consequence applied. henry cuellar representing a border district there how does the white house balance this or does it? they tried to say that they are looking for some kind of balance. but, when you look at the actual actions t
neil gorsuch. those usually aren t four names you hear in the. gulch current border crisis is not a covid crisis and courts should not be in the bills of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency. we are a court of law not policymakers of last resort. does that portend just given the makeup of who signed on to that of where this is headed in a few months. it s a really interesting makeup given that you have a divide there between liberal justices and conservative justices. i think we will have to hear of the whole case and find out. but this is why it is so important that congress do its job. it has to prioritize, having a country with borders and caring national sovereignty. this country s national sovereignty and then it needs to actually do the hard work of making it happen. it has been deferring some of its responsibilities to the executive branch, to the administrative state. both gul
axios, mollie hemingway the editor and chief at the federaliststrassel a member of e editorial board at the wall street journal. so, status quo for a little bit here. by the way, the president just left for saint croix and just said the court will not decide the matter until june but it is overdue. josh, this is on top of the statement the white house just came out with up a can pell hours ago saying that they re advancing their preparations to manage the border in a secure, orderly way. it seems as though this was due this week, no? it s a blow to the biden administration politically but it also buys them some time. the white house is sort of like the student who doesn t turn its term paper in on time and now got an extension to try to come up with a more conservative border security policy. they need to work with a plan to get the progressives on board but also be an effective plan to prevent the crisis that was really emerging and still is a
what parents need to know just ahead. richard: breaking tonight, the supreme court has we have fm coverage of this breaking news tonight. matt finn is on the ground in eagle pass, texas, one of the flash points from the border crisis. we begin with white house correspondent peter doocy live from the north lawn with reaction to the supreme court ruling. good evening, peter. peter: good evening, rich. this means nothing has to change until february. that is when the states suing to keep title 42 in place will have their day in court. so, for at least a few more months, cbp is going to keep this extra tool to expel migrants. but nobody on either side of this debate is really celebrating this ruling. it s a relief, you know, somewhat. if the biden administration still wants to put in place a new immigration policy, the
supreme court won t stop them as chief justice roberts writes his order does not prevent the federal government from taking any action with respect to that policy. the white house press secretary writes: we will, of course, comply with the order and prepare for the court s review and says of title 42 it should not be extended indefinitely. three liberal justices signed onto the dissent authored by conservative justice kneel gulch who writes the current border crisis is not a border crisis and courts should not be in the edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency. we are a court of law. not policy makers of last resort. that sounds like the argument earlier this year by the white house press secretary. it s not a policy health