strikes that damaged at least three buildings a terrorist attack. the city s mayor says two people were injured but none required hospitalization. cnn s clare sebastian is live in london for us. and this would seem to really bring the war home to the russian public even more than the drone strike on the kremlin a couple weeks ago. what more do we know about the attack itself and the kremlin s response this morning? yeah, state media reporting the three buildings as of now, two in moscow itself on the southwestern side of the city, and another on the outskirts not far from one of the major airports. you can see state media and telegramen chales posting videos showing people with drone fragments. defense minister saying that they were able to avoid attacks with drone warfare and five shot down using russian air defense missiles. so perhaps that is why there are fragments of those droughns. t drones. the damage was described as insignificant. two sought medical help but no one
fragments of those droughns. t drones. the damage was described as insignificant. two sought medical help but no one had to be hospitalized. but this still crosses a rubicon really for the russian people. as you say this is the first time we ve seen not only the sort of amount of drone accounts in kyiv this morning, the result of 31 drones launched at that city, but also in moscow itself. this really does bring it home to the russian people. no response from the kremlin as of yet. but a member of president putin s united russian party saying that this is the new reality that we have to now recognize, we need to drastically step up our defenses. he said do not underestimate the enemy. so this is something that the russian people are now having to recognize and reckon with. having said that though in the climate that exists in russia, one of feerks onar, suppression
briefing social media companies every single week. everyone s asking why were they doing that? andy mccarthy says in the national review that twitter files missed the real scandal f.b.i. interference in the 2020 election going on saying, quoting, the f.b.i. wasn t in a position to order the companies to suppression information. it was, however, well positioned to make them fear that the failure to suppress information it might appear as dodgy could be perceived as serious legal consequences. he s saying the f.b.i. was planting seeds before the new york post story was released, tom. the deep state had their man in twitter, james baker. so you had the f.b.i. reaping the top former f.b.i. lawyer who was a top lawyer at twitter at the time on these very issues, and, of course, you know, baker is infamous for running this anti-trump or helping run this anti-trump
watch. the president called it jim crow in the 21st century and a blatant attack on the substitution. does constitution. does he still see it that way? there was suppression. we saw that throughout the georgia election, so that is something that was reported on. i leave it to those reports. trace: no one was not allowed to vote, larry. they took the all-star game out of atlanta. the companies boycotted georgia. this was shameful on behalf of the woke part of this story. that s right. you had joe biden saying it was worse than jim crow. it s jim eagle. my dad is from georgia. born and raised from georgia, 1915 when jim crow was jim crow. how insulting was it to talk about this being worse than jim crow? it s jim eagle. the last is always talking about how systemically racist america is we just had a place in georgia, a former slave state in the deep south where a black democrat ran against a black republican. my goodness and nothing has