the need for proof of any actual election fraud listen. it can t just be, you know, somebody tweeted this. it s got to be demonstrable facts that can be laid out with evidence because that s what a court of law is going to look to, not just an allegation, but actual facts and so i feel i m hopeful you know, i m hoping rudy comes on the show tomorrow and he has some of those facts and i hope the legal team continues to lay out the specific evidence because that s what it s going to take to prevail in court. they were all pinning all of their hopes on rudy and sidney powell explains why team trump would go on to lose 61 times in court, judge after judge after judge in courts all across the country, some of those judges appointed by donald trump himself, as well as the united states supreme court dismissed trump s claims of fraud and his attempts to overturn the 2020 election through the courts and they lost because as they very well knew, as ted cruz knew, there wasn t an
asking for yet another four years in the white house together just 18 months ago. and then they lost. but when only one was prepared to acknowledge that, it seems, well, that there s no love that has now been lost between them. in talking january 6th, pence once said he didn t think he and trump would ever see eye to eye about that day. intimating that it was time to move beyond the 2020 election. today, pence has slolidified tht disconnect, stumping for georgia governor, brian kemp, a candidate who has wholly rejected trump s big lie, at least as a campaign platform-winning strategy. i am here to support brian kemp in tomorrow s republican primary. i can honestly say i was for brian kemp before it was cool. when you say yes to governor brian kemp tomorrow, you will send a deafening message all across america that the republican party is the party of the future. and with that, trump s former vice president just may have made the biggest and boldest break yet from the ma
trying to display. but in terms of the notion of why people turned out, do you really think they turned out because of inspite of or because of a legislation? i think i don t think the legislation is causing people to turn out or not to turn out. the issue with the legislation, we spent months and months and months hearing that people were going to be suppressed. people were going to be kept from the polls. people were going to be turned away. and it was all a huge lie. this law has made it easy for people to vote in both parties. you have republicans and democrats turning out in droves. and by the way, i suspect we re going to have really high turnout in november as well. so, everybody who wanted the law, brian kemp included, have been proven right. and everybody who said it was a disaster have been proven wrong. nina, what is your reaction to that? is it all a lie that suppression doesn t exist as the big boogie man? no, it s not a lie. and voters are turning out in spite of.