we will explain it all in this special edition of the ingraham angle, the twitter files. a few years back, conservative started noticing that their tweets weren t getting the traction they once did. now the common parlance became known as shadow banding. the amplify the reach of certain voices. this was so concerning that former ceo jack dorsey was brought before congress to ask questions about it. are you censoring people? people? no. twitter shadow banding prominent republicans. is that true? no. he was doing in a minute fasting. jack dorsey better be lawyering up. it sure looked like he lied under oath. playing kind of a game of semantics there. a little over two hours ago, former new york times columnist and free-speech champion began dropping more of those internal twitter files that show just how dedicated the company was for suppressing dissenting voices. for years this was going on. the liberals of last century, they used to relish at all these stories o
guess we re going to explain its all in this specialn of edition of the ingraham angle . the twitter files. fe now, a few years back ,vative conservatives started noticing that their tweets weren taction getting the traction they once did. tnow the common parlance became known as shadow manning. the effort to suppress orthe re amplify the reach of certainac voices. now, this was so concerning that former ceo jack dorsey was brought before congress to answer questions about it. fore are you censoring people? no. peo twitter shadow banning prominent republicans thad. is that true? no. well, he was doing intermittent fasting and so he can.jack dor now, tonight, jack dorsey better be lawyering up because it sure looks like he lied plder oath, playing kind of a gameay of semantics there. now, a little over two hours ago, former new york times columnist and free speech champion barry weiss began dropping more of those internal twitter files that showed justhe how dedica
bhattacharya, stanford university professor of medicinecine, doctor bhattachara ,your reaction tonight? this is blockbuster afte r secretlyetly you were placed on this trends blacklist, it feels likeeels l some novel froikm the nineteen fifties where the house e houn-american committee is meeting to to decide who to oppress. and i m some sort of like movie star from in hollywood that blacklisting because i m a communist or something. it s ridiculous.t or som. and it really hurt public. health. if we had an open discussion orhave the schools would not have c closed in the fall of 2020. if we had an open discussion, the lockdown s would have been lifted much earlier becaus beene data and evidence behind them was so bad. twitter, by suppressing scientific discussion, harms science, harm children and harm the american public. and i really do wonder how i ended up on the blog. i joined twitter in 2020 one in september.20se 2020 one who who told twitterpt0
bhattacharya, stanford university professor of med medicine. dr. bhattacharya, your reaction tonight. this is a blockbuster after learning you were secretly placed on this trends blacklist. yeah. it feels like some novel from the 1950s where the house of an american committee is meeting to decide who to suppress and i m some sort of movie star in hollywood that they are blacklisting because i m a communist or something. it s ridiculous. it really hurt public health. if we had an open discussion, laura, the schools would not have close in the fall of 2020. if we had an open discussion, the lockdowns would ve been lifted much earlier because data and evidence behind them was so bad. twitter, by suppressing scientific discussion, armed science, harm children, harm the american public, and i wonder how i end up on i joined twitter 2021, september 2021.
suppressing political speech, they were censoring doctors. medical professionals who were banned for warning that lockdowns would hurt kids. that school closures would hurt kids. here s one of the top doctors who was throttled by fauci and twitter. it really hurt public health. if we had an open discussion, laura, the schools would not have closed in the fall of 2020. if we had an open discussion, the lockdowns would have been lifted much earlier because the data and evidence behind them was so bad. twitter, by suppressing scientific discussion harmed science, harmed children, and harmed the american public. imagine how different all the small businesses could have stayed open. all the people that wouldn t have missed their cancer screenings. all the kids that wouldn t be depressed and suicidal. all the learning loss that could have been avoided if we just had an open scientific discussion. jesse: that was the point. they wanted control, not discussion. from politics to science.