states government in exchange for millions of dollars for themselves. change for crim a crime. itas aware of it when it happened and joe bidenit profited from it direcedt. ge it was a strong charge to make.y bertoni bob alinsky ha bdd th the document, the emailsmessaget and the text messages to prove that it happened. wehappen. we considered it a hue story and we spent an hour on it in october. oof twenty . cons still consider it a huge storylo in all of that time.ime no other no other major news organization in this countryllow has bothered to follow up.th the new york times neveriewed interviewed tonyto belinski as part of aen investigation into the biden family business deal thes, which is strange bece he was a partner with the bidenb family. but theniden neither has the washington post . neither have the other television networks. they v. e ignored it. se the fbi, whose job it is to enforce federat l law, did take a lengthy statement from tonyfrn during and during that c
so if we now know that that story was suppressed by appress federal agencyed by , the fbi, our biggest law enforcement agency, then how did the fbi not affect the election outcome? it sounds like the election was i ll just say it rigged in part there was.t wa there was.s.as so you can call rigt you can itn call it stolen. you could call it suppressed.u . the american people can call it the american people could call it whatever they want. but the fact pattern is th e fbie alone altered history in thaaltn election. did anyone at the new york times, the washington post ever call you?l so i have had a variety ofpeople people reach out to me, but m nobody that was willing to actually go through a detailedad interview of the facts. and , you know facts, jake tapp, i guess, well respected by manyy people at cnn. i appealed to him and chrisr an licht. i ll come for an interview.nd d an hour. s yo you can be as aggressive as youa want to be with me. you can call me a liar. you can attack