kristof, colonel. nick is saying he s talking about the possibility reasons the strike may have been called off. maybe it s postponed. again, not sure. i think there s more reporting to be done. what do you think the reason would be? well, there could be several things. i think nick pointed out some really good ones such as the idea of there perhaps being a weather issue. perhaps things weren t quite in pla place. when we went into iraq in 2003, we had months of preparation before we did anything, and of course there s nothing like that in this particular case. so, you know, not that we couldn t do stuff against iran, but there may be a situation, whether it s weather dependent or operationally, something that s contingent on operational issues that may have limited things. i think those are good suppositions in this case, but, you know, we re also looking at here is the possibility that it
village in 2045 or 2050 is wrong. reporter: stuart eves runs the local camping ground, saying the estimates are irresponsible given the impact on people s lives. it s a long-term problem so they ve got to start thinking about it now, don t they? to a degree. but if all your information is based on supposition and theory reporter: or science. or science. but science has got to depend on facts. if the facts aren t there then they come up with suppositions saying we believe. reporter: on fairborn s climate change front line we meet phillip hill. i don t dispute global warming is going to happen. reporter: he and his family brought a sea front home where you can t see the sea. the rising water is a distant threat. if we have to move, then we do. but at the moment i ll enjoy this lovely place and enjoy it. reporter: and it is a lovely place.
it now, don t you? to a degree. but if all of your information is based on supposition and theory or science. or science. but science has got to depend on facts. and if the facts aren t there, then they come up with suppositions, saying we believe. on fairborn s climate change front line, we meet philip hill. it is going to happen sometime. he and his family bought a sea front home, from where you can t see the sea, earlier this year, to him, the stone barrier still feels impregnable, the rising water a distant threat. if we have to move then, we do, but at the moment, we will enjoy 20 to 30 years at this lovely place and enjoy it. and it is a lovely place. yes. fairborn is engaged in a difficult conversation with many awkward questions. what will happen to these people? where will they go? who pays for it all? the scientific consensus says this community will not be alone in confronting these imminent
sopranos . those of us in the weeds may have suppositions about it, but the context has not been created. this is why it s so important to get all of this evidence out, to recognize we are in the era of talkies people are not necessarily going to read the whole report, sit and analyze each particular document, but this is what congress needs to do. it needs to create this narrative, this movie that s a very, very good analogy. so people begin to understand okay this doesn t necessarily prove anything, but it is part of a deeply troubling pattern. i think that s the connecting of the dots. and that s why it s so crucial for congress not to rely on people to read the documents but to actually put on the show. let s stick with the connective tissue. i think what we got today is an important piece of what links the mueller report to the incompetent corruption, which is i think part of what you re saying and what seems to me to always have an echo to what jim
the possible yin and the yang is. do you have any suppositions on that? well, the interesting thing is finding out that she s connected to one of these groups, which is called the committee for promotion of peaceful reunification of kchin, meaning bringing taiwan into china, which is perhaps their number one policy goal. a lot of people study china and its influence on the united states and they ve all done reports dtying this particular group to the chinese communist party and it s to advance their foreign policy around the world. so her connection there, again, you know, we don t have all the details because she s kind of gone underground here, but is very suspicious when you have