had been exposed as an elaborate lie. that letter was in itself a very sensational story, but it was inconsistent with all of the physical evidence in the investigation that had occurred to that point. which the prosecution listed in detail for the jury to hear. but there s always more than one side to a story. defense attorney dariel weaver told the jury that when she read carefully through all the prosecution material, here s what jumped right out at her. when you take a good hard look at their evidence, when you see that they ve interpreted the evidence to fit the conclusion that they drew in the first 12 hours of this case, you see that all it is is assumptions and suppositions and cut corners. reporter: but, said the defense, if the jury looked at facts and not assumptions, they d see ralph s story about what happened to pam had to be
they use them are all things that we can do to tighten up. it s not perfect. it s chaotic. we can t script it all but reduce the risk. martha: we re in trouble, a lot of things to figure out. thanks, ken trump. with that, we bring in bill dailey. i saw you on earlier with john and sandra. now we had a chance to listen to the information we just got, what stands out? what are you disturbed about and what were you enlightened on? sure, martha. the whole situation is disturbing from beginning to end. i think what we learned here what we didn t learn are also very important. we learned that the shooter approached the school unencumbered. a vehicle crashed. we can make suppositions about that. he scaled a fence, got his way to the school and shot at the
or lost loved ones. that s what he s apologised in relation to all the details and claims i think it s right as he was saying today the house of commons that sucre has given the time to conduct that investigation, there will be a full accounting of the prime minister will come back to the house of commons. will come back to the house of commons- will come back to the house of commons. ., , ., commons. that s the right way to handle this- commons. that s the right way to handle this. at commons. that s the right way to handle this. at what commons. that s the right way to handle this. at what other - commons. that s the right way to handle this. at what other line i commons. that s the right way to handle this. at what other line of| handle this. at what other line of employment would you be allowed to bring booze to your work meeting? you re making suppositions about the various kinds of questions in. that s precisely why sucre a very senior civil servant and has been tasked t
suppositions. that is precisely why sue gray has been tasked with looking at it in an independent investigation, to make sure all of this question can be answered in a way that is clear, transparent and open. way that is clear, transparent and 0 en. . way that is clear, transparent and oen. . , ., , open. dominic raab there. that is the latest from open. dominic raab there. that is the latest from downing open. dominic raab there. that is the latest from downing street. . we had the prime minister offering a part felt apology. he is very much under real pressure tonight. ben brown in downing street for sublessor turned out to the news that prince andrew has failed in his legal bid to get a usjudge that prince andrew has failed in his legal bid to get a us judge to dismiss an assault case burned against him by virginia brought against him by virginia giuffre. he has denied all the allegations she has made against him. earlier, we spoke to mark stevens, a lawyer with expertise in
neither invited nor did i attend. colleagues were drinking, they were eating picnic food. it was after 6pm. he said it was a work meeting. is that credible? the 6pm. he said it was a work meeting. is that credible? is that credible? the prime minister has come to is that credible? the prime minister has come to the is that credible? the prime minister has come to the house is that credible? the prime minister has come to the house of is that credible? the prime minister| has come to the house of commons, given clear accounts on this. he was clear he believed he was acting within the accordance of the rules at the time but of course understands that the perception of those in power not following the rules that many others are required to, particularly those who are been through hardship or lost loved ones during this pandemic, that is why he has apologised, and in relation to all the detailed claims and questions that have been raised, i think it is right, as he was saying today