enemies to engage in a prop propaganda war against us and use our own media to do it. useful idiots. what do i mean by this? folks, new questions are emerging about the coronavirus and the lab leak theory. they re serious questions that serious people in our media should have been asking and didn t because they practiced a bunch of chinese propaganda and pumped it down your gull ets. did they create a super virus, the chinese communist party and use the media to cover it up. the evidence is out there. the story by the wall street journal, published maybe a week ago, the wall street journal article. you ve got to read this. the science suggests a wuhan lab leak. the covid-19 pathogen as a genetic footprint that has never been observed in a natural coronavirus. kind of an important fact, no?
double cgg code? in lab research, gain of function research, where human beings make viruses more powerful to i m expect human beings. infect human beings. here s another damning quote from the wall street journal article. when the labs and colleagues published a paper in february 2020 with the virus partial genome they omitted any mention of the sequence that super charges the virus or the rare double ccg section. don t worry, media types watching my show and getting ready to pounce, i m sure it was just an oversight, the double cgg which is the one finger print that would indicate, not prove, but indicate this may have leaked from the lab and be a human generated virus, super virus, it s conveniently left out of the paper by authors who worked at the lab in wuhan, china. when did we know about this? did we know about this?
in the spring that dr. fauci had gone over to a meeting of world health leaders in europe around the world health assembly and actually briefed them on the information that they were looking at that this could have been a potential lab leak. that this string looked unusual. those discussions were going on. i was told that by a senior official in trump administration. i have reconfirmed that conversation that happened at the time contemporaneously with that meeting over a year ago. so i think early on when they looked at the strain they had suspicions. and in a closer analysis and it takes time to do that analysis, to dispel some of those suspicions. ainsley: gain of function research take an animal virus and make it a super virus and test how it affects humans. i talked to one doctor and said if you look at the strain, because you heard dr. gottlieb say it looked suspicious. when you look at the strain there is hglv. human t cell limp receptor on the virus.
wuhan lab noe of 2019. they went to the hospital with covid-like symptoms. then we learned that this gain of function research is happening there. and our country is giving money toward that. lawrence: which he denied. ainsley: that s when you take an animal virus and make it a super virus and then you test to see how it will effect humans in case it ever does get out. did a mistake happen in a lab? did these three doctors who went to the hospital, did they breathe in covid? did they take it to the hospital? can they spread it? we just have all of these questions and we deserve answers because so many americans and some people all over the world died. brian: especially if you are being intentionally deceptive. ainsley: correct. if you had the information and you are not being transparent. brian: if you have information and if you want to keep people away from asking questions, that s a problem. meanwhile, 8 minutes after the top of the hour, let s talk about the border disaster because
from day one by the scientific community. ainsley: i think what opened up all of this in this investigation rand paul was going back and forth with dr. fauci. he was on our show yesterday. he said gain of function research is when you take an animal virus and you make it a super virus and study how it would affect humans. that s what they do in this lab. is it coincidental in november of 2019 three doctors from wuhan lab go to the hospital with signs of cody? then it starts to spread in wuhan that november. then it goes to beijing first case december 8th. then it comes to america in january. brian: might have been here sooner. ainsley: some people think they had it in december. lawrence: there is a lot of things political in country. scientists should not be political. brian: they are. lawrence: jamie metzl is a democrat. he said there is a lot of politics being involved with the science and he was on tucker last night. take a look. early last year, i was