important precedent of these supreme court. roe was not a super president. calls for the overruling have never seized. it does not mean roe should be overruled. i understand the importance of the precedents set forth in roe v. wade. the supreme court of the 90s has held that roe v. wade that a fetus is not a person. it is the law of the land. i accept the law of the lands. good morning everyone. welcome to gilead. oh, i mean the cross connection. i am tiffany cross. today, for the first time in 49 years, american women are waking up with less rights than we had yesterday. that is because the supreme court struck down roe v. wade. people across the country have taken to the streets to protest the move. the majority of americans did not want at the court to overturn roe v. wade. a majority of americans. four men, who will never bear children, and one hand made in,
will actually go through with this? . , , , will actually go through with this? . , , this? i am, because they are art of this? i am, because they are part of the this? i am, because they are part of the nine this? i am, because they are part of the nine justices - this? i am, because they are part of the nine justices on i part of the nine justices on the united states supreme court who clearly oppose roe versus wade, and even though some of the language of the draft opinion may be changed somewhat, i think, opinion may be changed somewhat, ithink, in opinion may be changed somewhat, i think, in the end, they will strike down roe versus wade, which has been that the law of the land for almost 15 years, and this is not only a precedent, called a super president, roe versus wade, and it isjust catastrophic for women and girls in the united states that roe versus wade may finally be reversed. because that means it s going to be turned back to the states to decide if they wish to make
differently. the way it is used in the scholarship, and the way that i was using it in the article that you re reading from was to define cases that are so well settled that no political actors and no people seriously push for their overruling. i don t answering a lot of questions about row, which indicates the role doesn t fall in that category. and scholars across the spectrum say that it doesn t mean that roe should be overruled. but, descriptively, it doesn t mean that it is not a case that everyone has accepted and doesn t golfers overruling. here s what s interesting to me, you said that brown is i know my time is running out,, is a super president. that is something the supreme court has not even said but you have said that. so, if you say that, why won t you say that about roe v. wade? a case that the courts controlling opinion and that planned parenthood casey case has described as a super president? that s what i m trying to figure out. well, senator, i can just give yo
separately acknowledged that in planned parenthood v. casey, the supreme court s controlling opinion talked about the reliance interests on roe v. wade, which in treated in that case a super president. is roe a super president? how would you define super president. i m out of thought sunday i d be sitting in the chair, but i m not, i m up here, so i m asking you. people you super president differently. the way it is used in the scholarship, and the way that i was using it in the article that you re reading from was to define cases that are so well settled that no political actors and no people seriously push for their overruling. i don t answering a lot of questions about row, which indicates the role doesn t fall in that category. and scholars across the spectrum say that it doesn t mean that roe should be overruled. but, descriptively, it doesn t mean that it is not a case that everyone has accepted and doesn t golfers overruling.