iran hasn t been provided to congress. we haven t read it. the american public hasn t read it. but some of it has been reported that iran collects some of their own soil samples and inspects some of their own nuclear sites. so there are some serious flaws in the verification regime. and that s just part of it. the fact that the sunset provision a few years from now that iran has allowed to break out and in the meantime, continue to work on some of their advanced centrifuges and meanwhile, what we re seeing as a result of the nuclear deal is they continue to work to finance terror, to support assad in syria and hezbollah, to build the land bridge across the middle east towards the mediterranean. all of these other illegal test firing intercontinental ballistic missiles put the rhetoric aside. bill: there s a lot going on. her point about north korea, are you sending the right signal to kim jong un? absolutely. it shows you we re serious and not going to agree to a bad deal and not g
activity, they unjustly imprison united states navy sailors, they still hold american hostages there in their country today. if iran wants to continue this iran nuclear deal, we have to deal with the sunset provision, we have to strengthen the verification regime and we hath have to knock it off with all these other nefarious bad activities. it s destabling the middle east, it s destabilizing the world, on their holidays when they re chanting death to america. i heard a guest earlier saying that rouhani is a moderate, when i hear about rouhani propping up hezbollah and hamas and al qaeda. i believe the onus, most importantly really needs to be on iran, if they want to save
that the smet provisi the is taken out and no ballistic missile testing as the development and other agreements, given an extra three or six months and if he don t agree then let it go. i was going to say that sunset provision is what ten years from now the iranians will be able to go ahead and restart the nuclear program. but do you know if you re on the intelligence committee, is there a u.s. intelligence community assessment of the ramifications of the announcement by the president to abandon the deal? well, we ve certainly gotten briefed on different possibilities. and what i can say, obviously in an unclassified setting, it would be very dangerous for us to take that route. because at that point, iran could go full speed in developing nuclear weapons. and i m fairly confident that given this administration s position and what i consider an anxiousness to get into battles, could, i think, possibly lead to conflict with iran.
idea that the iran deal is probably dead. i think the only question here is what date you stamp on the tombstone. i think the trump administration has been pretty clear from really since the campaign that this isn t a deal they like. it s obvious why they don t like it. in fact, boris johnson probably made the case on fox & friends why we should leave the deal. harris: exactly. sunset provision, iran gets to leave the deal in 2025. don t think for a second iran is going to try to renegotiate a new deal then. they will probably sprint to build nuclear weapons for the same reasons the north koreans have nuclear weapons because it guarantees their security. iranians were smart in the deal to make sure that there is no restriction on ability for them to build missiles. don t think for a second that the iranians aren t getting technology from the north koreans they can buy to build icbms and make them with a nuclear weapon in the future. all of this is fakes news and fake debate that
expression of the concerns intelligence briefing from our perspective, donald trump does not want to bequeath to his successor a failed uranium policy similar to the one he deals with on north korea where iran is enriched with sanctions relief, icbm because that is not covered in the iran nuclear deal capable of targeting our homeland and nuclear breakout after the sunset provision closes out after 15 years with centrifuges and enrichment of uranium but they can breakout with a nuclear weapon, that is not where we want to go. in the country exempt from new metal tariffs will face tough restrictions like purchase quotas. peter navarro calling this a matter of national security. and steel and aluminum and tariffs on the european union, canada and mexico this week. agreements must be worked out by