the 2016 election that he believed would be beneficial to his reelection campaign. martha: once again, just like during the russia probe, adam schiff before this process has really actually begun, public hearings aren t until next week, he already knows what the answer is. that statement is full of crap. bill taylor. what does he base his belief that there was a quid pro quo on? what is the factual basis? a conversation with sundland. why did sundland change his testimony? was there a connection between sundland and democratic operatives on the committee? did he talk to schiff? did he talk to staffers? when someone remembers something they didn t know before it makes me incredibly suspicious. why did sondland change his mind? what prompted him to change his mind about maybe there was a quid pro quo when i said there