this wasn t george patton, but i don t think that works at the u.n., charles. and you ve been around long enough to know that threatening the u.n. or threatening this or threatening arms, it never works there. to get the he backed the u.n. into a corner. yeah. he s challenging the u.n. he s thrown down the gauntlet. i predict he will pick up the gauntlet. the u.n. isn t going to do a damn thing. you can t threaten these people pause that doesnbecause work. he just threatened them three weeks ago. he said we re going to do an air strike. no, i meant the u.n., not syria. i meant the u.n. but the u.n. doesn t exist. it s a fiction. it s a meeting ram. there s nothing there. so you would not have gone if you were the president, you would not have even shown up over there and tried to once again to compel them to do anything? you wouldn t even have bothered? of course not because the reason you go there is to give a speech that everybody will cover. you don t go there ex
and that their homeowners insurance protects them. [ thunder crashes ] it doesn t. stop pretending. only flood insurance covers floods. visit floodsmart.gov/pretend to learn your risk.
lawsuit for you, you don t have a claim or they can give you a right to sue which happened here. the government s not getting involved but saying these guys can go ahead. right. x they claim what? they came discrimination. they claim these ten contest ents, they re african-american, not white, and they never they were always booed out by the producers, tht the wasn t it, guilfoyle, they had a record or something? yeah. basically they re saying fraud and interference of economic prize winning and the whole deal that this was a corrupt thing that american idol used that s men, put them forward and this kind of mongering against them to create a scandal to bos ratings. therefore they each want $25 million in damages. do all of them have records? eight out of ten of them have records. and the other two lied on their applications. okay. so they re claiming that they were used and abused. right. this doesn t sound credible to me at all. here s the legal stand po
this wasn t george patton, but i don t think that works at the u.n., charles. and you ve been around long enough to know that threatening the u.n. or threatening this or threatening arms, it never works there. to get the he backed the u.n. into a corner. yeah. he s challenging the u.n. he s thrown down the gauntlet. i predict he will pick up the gauntlet. the u.n. isn t going to do a damn thing. you can t threaten these people pause that doesnbecause work. he just threatened them three weeks ago. he said we re going to do an air strike. no, i meant the u.n., not syria. i meant the u.n. but the u.n. doesn t exist. it s a fiction. it s a meeting ram. there s nothing there. so you would not have gone if you were the president, you would not have even shown up over there and tried to once again to compel them to do anything? you wouldn t even have bothered? of course not because the reason you go there is to give a speech that everybody will cover. you don t go there ex
lifted a finger on any struggle, any war, any conflict in 50 years is going to act. i mean, that s a childish expectation. i can predict to you with 100% accuracy that no resolution will pass the security council threatening the use of force on syria. yeah, because of russia and china. it won t. right. so what is it to say if this doesn t happen that will show the u.n. once again has failed? of course, it fails. the only question is, will the u.s., which is the entity that holds up international stability, will it fail? everybody aniy knows the u.n. w fail. all right. i didn t think it was a bad speech. i didn t think it was, as i said, patton going in there, but i don t think that works. it wasn t jfk either. it wasn t even you any, it wasn t eisenhower. forget about patton, you know. it wasn t macarthur. it was no one. but it was in that forum, you know. he s trying he s desperately