fact he ll miss some conversations about climate change and other topics this might mean all seven leaders won t potentially be signing the end of summit communique how serious is this i mean this is unique and i think it is a big problem with the g seven is a very important clump of the former world leaders it s not without china so they have to defend their position there s good reason to believe that there will be more g. seven summits and more more of that but. trump is always willing to show that he s able to walk away from the table that he can destroy procedures and organizations that of us hold dear just to have a better outcome for america ok alec ng i had some probably already is too as he s heading to singapore with the north korea summit on the horizon how are the leaders at this summit looking ahead to that i think they re happy that there is talk that there is an america trying to negotiate and talk itself out of the crisis but
i think it is very likely the summit will take place on june 12th as planned. how much the communique of the summit resolves the essential disputes between the u.s. and north korea, i think is much less certain. at this point, the summit communique may very well be a general political level commitment on the part of the u.s. and north korea to negotiate a subsequent agreement that will have all of the crucial details. and that subsequent negotiation could take months or even years to complete. this is a going to be assuming it takes place, a bilateral summit between the u.s. and north korea. it is not like what we have seen in the past. we re seeing last minute jockeying on the sidelines with china weighing in, russia, japan as well. what effect is that going to have on this process? well, i think the nuclear issue has always been
and normalization of relations with the united states. so i expect the purpose of the letter is to reassure president trump that he should go ahead with the summit meeting on june 12th, and that at the meeting kim jong-un would be willing to commit in a general way to denuclearization. you said that the real work here is after the summit. if the summit doesn t happen, you seem to feel like it will, but if it doesn t happen, what does that mean for all the work that would need to be done after the summit? is it dead in the water? well, i wouldn t say that, because you could always delay the meeting. if the if the arrangements for the meeting like the negotiations of this summit communique can t be finished by june 12th there is no reason why you couldn t have the meeting a month later on july 12th. so i don t think trump and kim are prepared to give up. i think both leaders want to have a historic summit.
been held, not only among western countries but talks with russia, nothing has changed that course. so it remains to be seen now what could constitute escalation for additional and more damaging sanctions to be issued and what could be deescalation. we ask that question yesterday. michelle, we re going to jump out. the president has now taken the stage with the prime minister of the netherlands. the two men are addressing the congregated press there. let s listen to what they are saying. i am proud to present our summit communique to you today. building of the progress remains early in washington and seoul. this communique sets the bar even higher. we have taken major steps towards meeting all three main objectives of the nss process. i will say a few words about each. the first objective is to reduce the amount of dangerous nuclear material in the world.
have started to negotiate but he wanted to make the initial initial step a bit more uncomfortable for the others speaking of course and consisting of but he s expected to leave this meeting rather early several hours early in fact he ll miss some conversations about climate change and other topics this might mean all seven leaders want potentially be signing the end of summit communique how serious is this i mean this is unique and i think it is a big problem but the g. seven is a very important clump of the former world leaders it s not without china so they have to defend their position there s good reason to believe that there will be more g seven summits and more more of that but. trump is always willing to show that he s able to walk away from the table that he can destroy procedures and organizations that of us hold dear just to have a better outcome for america ok i ll get ahead from probably already is to as he s