And. Hi, im David Stewart this is any first time in city hall so im not as the first speaker i hope to do this the right way and take two minutes and 48 seconds im here actually, i live about 8 blocks from this site i work near there, too and dont have a particular i guess i dont know the developer i own a Small Business and as part of that ive seen people on my team try to find housing when we come to San Francisco some of them have lived here a a long time and some newcomers it is catastrophic how hard it is for people to find reasonably priced homes in the city i understand people having may have a vetted interest iengsz e im not going to be the majority of opinion this is important for the city to move forward weve heard about the people and jobs moving here we need housing we need this sort of project ive reviewed it and you know this is in an area that has you know theres no Perfect Place to not disrupt some place in the not a space that is utilized it is not a 20 aspire building
This cumulative irs have been addressed theyve made an apples and oranges project for the eastern neighborhood and compared them to developments just in Shipley Square and potrero hill loolth the reports in the area without filling the units that are constructed the fact weve already exceeded the potrero hill projections and show case square by 20 percent we dont need to wait for the 2015 monitoring report we were promised a few array of Public Benefits to show the completeness of neighborhoods including the open space and improved transit and the Community Facilities and the Affordable Housing so where are those promised benefits . Improved Public Transit the traffic study for the project has a number ten bus running at 98 capacity at rush hour before the 7 thousand neighbors arrive as the 22 we leader we get to keep it for 2 to 5 years to have it it rerouted after the projects traffic we have several intersections at potrero hill with that are another unacceptable levels our air qual
Trains back to the rail generated this also shows a railcar unloading facility down there are towards the bottom of the rail track it shows Materials Handling systems and storage shed and also ship loading conveyance system to load the very well in the request for proposals well the respondents can choose to use this design weve provided for them or come up with we they consider a better design of their own this the diagram shows a larger the larger Rail Infrastructure conducting the rail generated we could triple the loop and add 5 additional particularly stock exchanges in the rail yard the red is the existing port rail and the green is new track in terms of the objectives that the port has for the proposal process first of all we would like to further the maritime Commerce Mission and also like to bring to full utilitytions a port asset and take advantage of the properties unique capacities for instance the fact it has 40 feet of water depth it has direct rail can we theres not room
Why do we have to send, drawn as the staff, and we have planning and to have the drawings and a couple of years to plan check. You have to make sure that you dont have an answer for you and it is made at a level than mine. But the things that may come to my mind is the required bike parking on it and the addendum and now there are no bike parking and we will go through the approval process and it will be approved, and the addendum on it and now it does not have bike parking, but it was supposed to and that is what planning requirement was that it was in there and maybe a bad example. But they have not given you a commitment as to the time frame as to how long this will take. If they have it, it was a different level in mind. Okay. It is an open book. So it fits, and to the director . Yeah. Commissioner, and that was discussed in the public advisor meeting and planning and what did they inaudible and they can turn around fast, but my experience is state that they are fast paced is not o
Change and that is visually different, than what was approved, i get it, i understand that. But, an architect is supposed to, and my understanding is that an architect who is licensed and an issue of responsibility who got a plan approved that if he makes a change that he thinks would interpret that the Planning Department would see it differently, would highlight it and then in that case it would go back. But we are going back plan checking. The Planning Department drawn and it has no changes and that an architect will stamp and say that there are no changes. I thought that we were kind of thinking in those terms, rather than saying, hands up everything goes back, because, you understand what the volume of business that we are doing right now that this is really burdensome on a department who will admit that they cannot plan check what they have right now. Yeah, i understand that. Roughly, i can roughly in 2013, on that lot on their side, and the problem is that i want to lay the roud