Santa claus is coming to town. Santa claus is coming to town. You better watch out. You better not cry. You better not pout, im telling you why. Santa claus u is coming to to. Lauren welcome to fbn a. M. Good morning. Im lauren simonetti. Deirdre im deirdre bolton. Lauren five days until christmas. Deirdre thats right. Today is friday. Lauren a lot of investors might be hitting vacation early but still lets take a look at your money. Weve certainly seen a strong meltup after a trio of record closes idea, fractional declines for all three major average as. The nasdaq is down 4 points. It could be on the verge of a sevenday winning streak. Investors on mitt particular, phase one of a china deal will be signed next month. Deirdre japans auto sector falling after the house passing the new north american trade deal, usmca, so that kind of weighed on the nikkei. Lauren lets take a look at european stocks this friday. You have up arrows across the board, nice gain in london, the ftse gaining
From the house of representatives and dividing rebuttal time. To start with the issues raised in the court in the supplemental briefing order, we think the states were clearly injured by the judgment below and are aiming to appeal it. Judge elrod you might want to move the microphone. Mr. Siegel after this up a, all parties agreed this court has appellate jurisdiction. That is because of the continuing enforcing of the Affordable Care act until the court orders not to do so. They now welcome it, and the participation of the states and house of representatives and ensure their will be an ensure there will be an adversarial presentation of the issues in this case. Turning to the other issues in this case, the central feature of this appeal is that when judge engelhardt when you say your standing, the interbeen the intervening states, are you conceding the standing of the plaintiff states . Mr. Siegel no, your honor. Judge engelhardt so you are here in new orleans, telling us that the sta
The District Court committed multiple fundamental errors in refusing to dismiss this suit and plaintiffs can i ask you to speak up just a little bit . Bring the microphone a little closer, if you can. And the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this court is powerless to correct any of those errors at this time. Now, we have identified two different paths through which this court can have mandamus relief. The Supreme Court made clear that separation of powers considerations are of utmost important when considering mandamus petitions involving the president of the United States. For example, the court quoted chief Justice Marshall to say that in no case would a court be required to proceed against the president as it would against a private individual. And moreover, the court said that the high respect that is due the office of the president must be considered throughout the entire proceeding. Now, what does that imply in this case . It implies the following. Their p
Columbia seek to an implied cause of action to enforce emolument clause against the president of the United States. The Municipal Court committed errors in dismissing the suit could i ask you to speak up just a little bit and bring the microphone closer if you can. And the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this court is powerless to correct any of those errors at this time. Now, we have identified two different paths through which this court can grant mandamus relieve. The Supreme Court in cheney made clear, its utmost when involving mandamus and the preds of the United States and in no case would a court be required to proceed against the president as it would against a private individual and moreover, the court said that the high respect due the office of the president must be considered throughout the entire proceeding. Now, what does that imply in this case . It implies the following. Their position is that even if the District Court erred in refusing to dismi
Right with any ability to venture beat on the curtilage with a a firearm even locked ad unloaded, a matter of government grace period that he is inconsistent with text, history, tradition and this court cases. The text of the Second Amendment protects rights to keep and bear arms. That latter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protects rights that are not strictly limited to the premises. There is no historical analog for the cities prohibition on transporting firearms to places where the may be lawfully use. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the training ground. The regulations on limiting where firearms may be discharged or were training may occur that the city invokes both underscore that the general rule was that firearms could be safely transported between and among places way they could be used and discharge. This court recognized as much in heller, both by recognizing the long history of handgun poss