sue him anyway. even if we lose, the american public will understand. well, dan s piece, as comprehensive as it is alarming. nicholas burns offered his opinion several times on this show. he said this is different and more damaging than any other involving past presidents over the past half-century. there is no war room. he is relying on the white house counsel to make the message known to lawmakers. they sent a letter to democrats that was a blue print for the stonewall they have been trying to build. we know that letter may have had white house signature on it but maybe not his loan. the letter was notable not for the conclusion it reached few suspected that the administration was going to for the broad sides and rhetorical
now it is the outrageous impeachment. look, impeachment. i never thought i d see or hear that word with regard to me. impeachment. i said the other day it s an ugly word. it s an ugly word. very ugly word. it means so much. it means horrible, horrible crimes and things. for those of you that things she was reasoned for the last six months. no, no, no, no. i said she s going to do it. she wants to have it carried out closer to election. she s going to do it. not a good person. i think she hates our country. we re going after these people. these are batted, bad people. i actually told my lawyers, sue him anyway.
proper processes and so on. yeah, i mean i don t think they could just move on from giuliani. you know, for instance, if they think they have a basis for bringing him in to testify, slap him with a subpoena. if he doesn t appear, sue him, and then see, or then just move on. i also think there s, you know, no news flash in saying that there aren t very many democrats who think they have any chance of getting enough senators to convict in the senate. right. that s true. what about senator grassley s comments today about the whistle-blower? i m just wondering how, as someone who knows the hill well, how significant is that because some people are saying, well, it s sort of a break from the president. he s saying the whistle-blower should be listened to and it should go through i was surprised that grassley didn t say this last week when the whistle-blower came out. he has historically for decades been probably the biggest champion for whistle-blowers in the government. and the
everything democrats are accusing trump of, they did. the collusion, threats, collusion, getting rich off the family connection, it s not like trump and listed foreign agents to spy on his political opponent to influence election, but wait, that s what obama, biden and hillary did. no one expects trump to lay down and take it, they can smear, sue him and investigate him, fire and collude against him, but until he fights back, they call that high crime. but, here is the real story, the intelligence community data control, they even have to get trump for the jump, the witch-hunt failed so this is part two. the new york times reports the whistleblower cia but read his report, he didn t have the loan, it s a sophisticated inside job like last time, leaks, fac fakes
everything democrats are accusing trump of, they did. the collusion, threats, collusion, getting rich off the family connection, it s not like trump and listed foreign agents to spy on his political opponent to influence election, but wait, that s what obama, biden and hillary did. no one expects trump to lay down and take it, they can smear, sue him and investigate him, fire and collude against him, but until he fights back, they call that high crime. but, here is the real story, the intelligence community data control, they even have to get trump for the jump, the witch-hunt failed so this is part two. the new york times reports the whistleblower cia but read his report, he didn t have the loan, it s a sophisticated inside job like last time, leaks, fac fakes