he doesn t seem to have it, what i watched all my life that thing in politics that makes a person interesting, intriguing, you want to hear their next word what they are up to you care about them, fascinating, obvious an attractive man, a good success record, a good family, i like him when i meet him. i don t feel that curiosity about him that i do about great politicians. your thoughts. me in my broad tastes, i think that he s actually a very interesting guy. what are you curious about him? what would you like to know what he doesn t want to know? i think he is attractive now. what about mitt romney, what do you find interesting about him? his background. he s a businessman. olympics, governor, he has done a loft things in his life. makes him interesting? huh? okay. he s more of a known commodity that actually helps him to some extent. some of the stuff he had to go through in 2008, not go up through again, put the mormon question to rest to some extent. in our w
thing in politics that makes a person interesting, intriguing, you hear their next word what they are up to you care about them, fascinating, obvious an attractive man, a good success record, a good family, i like him when i meet him. i don t feel that curiosity about him about politician. your snoufrnlts my broad tastes, i think answers interesting guy. what are you curious about him? what would you like to know what he doesn t want to know? i think he is attractive now. what about mitt romney, what do you find interesting to him? his background. he s business guyin man. olympics, governor, he has done a loft things in his life. makes him interesting? a known commodity, actually does help in some extent, some of the stuff he had to go through in 2008, not go up through again, put the mormon question to rest to some extent. in our world? in our world in the united
saying somehow the preamble has any impact. we avenue moving ahead with the missile defense with all due respect we will not solve it here. guys, if i can, we ll move on to another subject, it is something particularly you senator graham want to talk about, terro detainees and how we handle them. we have secretary of state hillary clinton on fox news sunday last week and despite the fact that ahmed gillani, the alleged co-conspirators now convicted in the case of the bombings of the u.s. embassies in africa, on one count, he was acquitted on the other 284 counts and despite all of that, here s what secretary clinton said about the handling of terror detainees, in federal civilian trials, watch. you look at the success record, in civilian courts, of convicting, sentencing, detaining and maximum security preference, by the civilian courts, it surpasses what yet has been accomplished in the
preamble has any impact. we are moving ahead with the missile defense. chris: with all due respect we are not going to solve this here and guys if i can move on to another subject. i know this is something particularly you senator graham want to talk about and that is about terror detainees and how we handle them. we had secretary of state clinton on fox news sunday last week and despite the fact that the alleged coconspirator, i guess he has now been convicted in the case of the bombings of the u.s. embassies in africa, although he was convicted on one count he was acquitted and all of the other 284 counts. despite all of that here is what secretary clinton said last week about the handling of detainees in federal civilian trials. let s look. when you look at the success record in civilian courts of convicting, sentencing, detaining in maximum security prisons by the civilian courts it surpasses what yet has been accomplished in the military
this is supposed to be the easiest trial to conduct. i guess the question is do you have any choice now except to hold all of the terror detainees at gitmo or either give them military trials or hold them indefinitely? i think the verdict needs to be put in a larger context. the sentence for what he was convicted of is 20 years to life. that is a significant sentence. secondly, some of the challenges in the courtroom would be the very same challenges before a military commission about whether or not certain evidence could be used. thirdly, we do believe that what are called article three trials, in other words in our civilian courts, are appropriate for the vast majority of detainees. there are some for whom it is not appropriate. you will get no argument from this administration on that point. when you look at the success record in civilian courts of convicting, sentencing, detain in maximum security prisons by the civilian courts it