So we need to do the same thing in syria. Mr. Speaker, another reason for action now is that success in iraq in squeezing the caliphate is put at risk by our failure to act in syria. This border is not recognized by isil and we tamper our efforts if we stop acting when we reach the border. When we come to the question, why now, we have to ask ourselves whether the risks of inaction are greater than the risks of taking action . Every day we failed to act is a day when isil can grow stronger and more plots can be undertaken. Mr. Speaker, that is why their all says yes,ved that the risks of inaction are someto some of our asking specifically whether taking action can make the u. K. More of a target for iso. The judgment of the direct general of Security Service in the chairman of the joint Intelligence Committee is that the u. K. Is already in the top tier of countries that isil is targeting. I am clear that the only way to deal with that reality is to address the threat we face, and do s
All coming together. I was incredibly moved. I was incredibly inspired by the team work. I was so proud of our National Health service. [applause] any great hospital, go to any great school, it is the team that makes it strong. Think about our brilliant armed forces. Let us pay tribute to them, my friend. [applause] our brilliant, heroic troops serving our country in the most dangerous places. Talk to any of them, they will talk about the team, and the team that makes it strong. It is true of business. It is true of Public Services. True of our armed forces. True in some walks of life. You see, ethic of the 20th century, hierarchy, order, planning, control, the talents of a few. The ethic of the 21st century is cooperation everybody playing their part, sharing the rewards, the talents of all together. Friends, it is time we ran the country like we know it can be run. [applause] heres a question for you. If the challenge is to run the country, on this principle of together, can the tori
Of this government. Mr. Ahmadinejad managed to isolate iran diplomatically, and mr. Rouhani is in reality bringing iran out of diplomatic isolation. So, yes, they are succeeding, and the western media is not paying attention. They should. They should, to begin with, start reading what mr. Rouhani has said all over the years. Back in 1999, iran, you know, the Islamic Republic, experienced its most serious political unrest. That was the Tehran University unrest which spread to the entire country. Which politician do you think it was that went to the public and supported the revolutionary guard, and the Police Suppression of the students movement. It was mr. Rouhani. Mr. Rouhani systematically called the students foreign agents. Mr. Rou manny systematically at the extreme National Security council was banning newspapers. And now, people are expecting that mr. Rouhani, of all the people, is going to allow freedom of the press . Why . Why . This is what i believe is the mistake of the weste
And thank you all for coming. Well be in touch about another session before too long. Thanks again. Voters go to the polls in sticks weeks for congressional midterm elections. Up next on cspan 3, a look at how National Security issues could influence the november elections. Then, a discussion on the u. S. Tax code. Well also bring you a meeting with Asian American journalists. Later, remarks from house intelligence chair congressman mike rogers. On the next washington journal, a look at the role of the National Institutes of health and medical research, their funding and their vomt in combatting outbreaks like ebola. Well hear from dr. Francis collins, nih director. We continue with patricia grady, and dr. Griffin rogers, director of the National Institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases. And Northwest University is next on our big ten bus tour. Washington journal is live every morning at 7 00 a. M. Eastern on cspan and you can join the conversation on facebook and twitte