of australia might to steal a line froml emma bunton say, i what took you so long? david, this will presumably go well in downing street if this is the case, but borisjohnson has got enough problems at home with the effects of his energy policy, subsidising consumer prices, production costs. there is a price cap for consumers, but it will go up. is that the best way to square this circle? every government faces the dilemma of, how do you limit the cost of living for families for voters, let s be blunt while also trying to tackle climate change? if you were to take a purest economic view, you would say the most logical thing to do is a carbon tax. there are some carbon taxes on some fuels, but here in the uk, on petrol and diesel, those taxes have not risen for years now because it would be
the australian public to do - more on climate change, and in the last 24 hours, | there s been some big progress for us on this issue. the treasurer has come out. and backed australia actually cutting its carbon emissions, - net zero by 2050, and that is really significant because the australian government has never said this before. the prime minister has actively avoided making this sort - of commitment in the lead up - to cop26, so now the expectation is that actually australia might i move to net zero before cop26, but i think the international friends of australia might j to steal a line from emma bunton say, what took you so long? - david, this will presumably go well in downing street if this is the case, but borisjohnson has got enough problems at home with the effects of his energy policy, subsidising consumer prices, production costs. there is a price cap for consumers, but it will go up. is that the best way to square this circle? every government faces the dilemma of,
2050, and that is its carbon emissions, net zero by 2050, and that is really- its carbon emissions, net zero by. 2050, and that is really significant because 2050, and that is really significant because the 2050, and that is really significant because the australian 2050, and that is really significantl because the australian government has never because the australian government has never said because the australian government has never said this because the australian government has never said this before. - because the australian government has never said this before. the - has never said this before. the prime has never said this before. the prime minister has never said this before. the prime minister has has never said this before. the prime minister has actively - has never said this before. the - prime minister has actively avoided makihg prime minister has actively avoided makihg this prime minister has actively avoided making this sort prime minister h