bar i would like to get out over that bar. just a sign of the time, my friend. thank you as always. thanks to you at home for joining me this hour. we begin tonight with breaking news. the new york times has just published a major new report about israeli intelligence failures in the lead-up to the october 7th hamas attack. according to the reporting not yet verified by nbc news officials obtained the detailed battle plan for hamas attack more than a year before the attack took place. quoting from the new york times israeli officials obtained the battle plans for the october 7th terrorist attack more than a year before it happened, documents and e-mails and interviews show. but israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational, considering it too difficult for hamas to carry out. the approximately 40-page document which the israeli authorities code named jericho wall outlined point by point the devastation that led to the deaths of abou
lines like - federalism, attorney wor product and the list goes on and on and but more importantly the obvious attempt to try and intimidate mr. brag an potentially the grand jury now that the indictment is out there and they have change their strategy to simply attacking it as a witch hunt that should not have bee undertaken and that he should b prosecuting other cases. but certainly within his - texas size it discretion i this way, we will see what the charges are. shortly, when they are unveile and unsealed but so far he has been on lega ground and the republica attacks have been predictabl but misguided. so, could they compel d bragg to testify before th house by subpoenaing him and as brag have a case to refuse that subpoena considering they are still inside this investigation an
bustling. we have asked the leader of starbucks, they had a ceo howard schultz to explain to us why he thinks it s acceptable that over 50 occasions the nlrb said they broke federal labor law in breaking unions so we hope to have him come before our committee. there will be a vote on wednesday, a vote on subpoenaing him. it just seems like there is a [ applause ] a strange sort of hypocrisy there because these are using liberal companies. i think whole foods, also and it s like they care a lot about the indigenous people of the bolivia andes but not some worker in cincinnati. you got it. they re very liberal about everything except whether workers can form a union and earn descent wages. they re very liberal [ applause ] except whether or not we ask them to pay their fair share of taxes that aren t so liberal then. that s right. thank you, everybody.
leading up to january 6th and the pressure he faced from president trump at the time there, yet he has never gone and testified under oath. is it a big distinction in and a notable one, he said before the january 6th committee talked about subpoenaing him, he said he closed the door on that. at the time, on the basis of potential executive privilege and making the case that no vice president has ever been subpoenaed before by the department of justice to testify about conversations that him as the vice president had with the president of the united states. now, what you hear him outlining is a planned defense from him and his legal team that he was in the position as the president of the senate working for the legislative body that day on january 6th. now, it s notable that lindsey graham, in fact, actually when it came to the subpoena he received in fulton county, georgia, to come testify, he tried to make a similar claim and argued that in article 1 of the institution there, it is th
oval office one day just before january 6th and told the president, president trump at the time, that there had been nobody outside of his family more loyal than him, and what you have consistently seen is mike pence defend the actions of the administration outside of the events of donald trump s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. when it comes to this subpoena, he says that he is going to fight it on the grounds of the role that he played on that day of january 6th. and that was, as the president of the senate. urn the speech or debate clause of article i of the institution, it outlines that house and senate members cannot face the legal inquiry from the department of justice over their deliberations in the legislative body. this is the issue is because just a couple of months ago, ahead of the january 6th select committee on capitol hill talking about subpoenaing him, his position at the time was as