was 18 usc section 50 19, which prohibits obstructing an investigation. so, andrew, there is the charge in the case saying, i saw evidence of probable cause of obstruction of justice already, before the search warrant and was executed. now, if you reveal what i saw in the affidavit, you are increasing and aiding and abetting, in fact, more obstruction of justice and subordination of perjury. if i were at doj and i saw the written order, i actually think it is a little better for them than what he said in court. he seems very solicitous with the various factors that the department laid up for him, which is the concern about national security. the criminal case and witness intimidation and threats and of course, this judge
prohibits obstructing an investigation. so, andrew, there is the charge in the case saying, i saw evidence of probable cause of obstruction of justice already before the search warrant and was executed. now, if you reveal what i saw in the affidavit, you are increasing and aiding and abetting, in fact, more obstruction of justice and witness intimidation and subordination of perjury. if i were at doj and i saw the written order, i actually think it is a little better for them than what he said in court. he seems very solicitous with the various factors that the department laid out for him, which is the concern about national security. the criminal case and witness intimidation and threats and of course, this judge himself knows about the threats because he has been the beneficiary of the threats as a
judge says, release has going for it. eddie ever factor, the judge cited in his order, indicates that he should not release it. the judge also raised these points, that he said he needs to consider in this question. and these are truly unique when it comes to a matter involving a presidential investigation. the judge said, legitimate governmental concerns include whether, witnesses will be unwilling to cooperate and provide truthful information, if their identities might be publicly disclosed. law enforcement s ability to use the future maybe compromised if these techniques become known to the public. and there will be, there will be, he says, an increased risk of obstruction of justice or subordination of perjury if subjects of the investigation know the investigative sources and methods. he says one of the statutes for which i found probable cause
every other factor, the judge cited in his order, indicates that he should not release it. the judge also raised these points, that he said he needs to consider in this question. and these are truly unique when it comes to a matter involving a presidential investigation. the judge said, legitimate governmental concerns include whether, witnesses will be unwilling to cooperate and provide truthful information, if their identities might be publicly disclosed. law enforcement s ability to use certain investigative techniques in the future maybe compromised if these techniques become known to the public. and there will be, there will be, he says, an increased risk of obstruction of justice or subordination of perjury if subjects of the investigation know the investigative sources and methods. he says one of the statutes for which i found probable cause was 18 usc section 50 19, which
this is professor kimberly crenshaw. she and her colleagues invented critical race theory. critical race theory is the study of how law has historically facilitated racial projects of subordination like enslavement, like genocide, like colonialism, and how it continues to embed itself in our contemporary world. great. well done, professor crenshaw. we ll come back to you a little later. so i felt like i was placed on there not because of my credentials but we need someone who looks like you to sit here while we re talking about critical race theory and equity. be the black face amongst the white faces? right. what would you say the racial makeup of that district is? ironically, it s 60% minority. how many seats on the board? five seats.