they will not disappear overnight but stay there and be stored on these files and used at any point. so whether it is general intelligence gathering or pulling down the road, we don t know yet. todd: as for the avid self how telling is it in the u.s., tiktok is basically here to dumb down our youth, whereas china tiktok is an educational tool where kids learn things like subject matters, math, science, et cetera. many call the application digital s fentanyl. the perfect way to describe it it is poisoning the minds of our children with depraved content and nothing like what the chinese are allowing their own children to view. they are a real-world implications for the kids are being promoted as bodily harm content. things that encourage them to behave in a way that for them and have long-term consequences. no one is doing anything to protect them. so the burden should be placed upon the parent entirely but the lawmakers should step in and bear the application. todd: to that point,
is in doctrination. they would be telling kids to think reparations are necessary, intersectionality is real and so on. i think he s going to make that argument, but the reality is that this whole thing is just about not wanting you heard sara sidner say it, the objections are to the reading list, including an author that they don t like. kimberly crenshaw. that, i think, is transparent to people. i also think people are not stupid, okay, they understand that when you allow ap european history, ap japanese history and say, okay, black folks, we re not going to teach your history because we don t like the way that we don t like the subject matters that are in the curriculum, i think that that is very transparent to people. and i have a lot of questions about beyond florida, beyond this political moment, whether
we know that the penn-biden office didn t even open until 2018. so we know that some of these documents are were moved at least twice. but, the other interesting thing is that they were not just distributed to different points, they were also divided. right? you have got one document that was found in the library, others in the garage. so the question is why were these documents sent and used in different places? it suggests that they were, you know, knowingly divided. and that s going to be a question that the special counsel is going to have to look at. we know the president was working on a book that dealt with ukraine and some of these other subject matters. so, if the president actually saw these documents, it would be hard to miss that they re classified because they reportedly had tsci classification marks. i have worked with classified material for decades and i can tell you it s pretty darn hard to miss that. so, if he did work off these