president trump was trying to cause, has become a distraction for him. they asked for this investigation. the white house and ordered to stop talking about the tweets asked congress to investigate this. they have. they want proof. the president is the only one with proof. shepard: and at this moment we re not talking about russia, the connections, why so much smoke, why so many trump officials and former trump officials lied about talking to the russians. did general flynn lie to the fbi about it, what is paul manafort s connections. all of these questions unanswered and we can t get any information, that is off the table. if the investigations happen and they find there was nothing from the very beginning, what do you get besides a so what and another subject change? you re exactly right. the one thing to mark on the calendar is march 20th. that s the day that james comey
sounds like a subject change or shift into what he actually said that millions of people voted illegally. is he change up here? are they switching what is happening? did talk to senior administration official earlier who said that president trump could sign executive action as soon as tomorrow to launch federal investigation into something most election experts agree is not a problem. widespread voter fraud just doesn t exist in the u.s. when we heard president trump talking about david muir at abc, breaking it down to people who live in two different states and registered in them, dead and on the voter rolls. not the same as what he said shortly after the election and what he said at congressional reception the other tonight that he believes millions of people in the u.s. are voting illegally. it s a shift rhetorically in
because he is leading. leading significantly. he doesn t have 100% name idea. that s the part of this striking to me about a huckabee/santorum. i think the other question is where is the money going to come from for these guys? will rick santorum get a white whale to help grow this campaign like did he last time? can they win the money race? i ll do a quick subject change. turn to this heated debate over privacy. midnight parts of the patriot act are likely to extend. the issue of the ability of the national security agency to tell telecom companies to giving over the phone records of millions of americans. let s say the government suspects jane doe being involved in terrorism. jane calls 10 people.
he doesn t have 100% name idea. that s the part of this striking to me about a huckabee/santorum. i think the other question is where is the money going to come from for these guys? will rick santorum get a white whale to help grow this campaign like did he last time? can they win the money race? i ll do a quick subject change. turn to this heated debate over privacy. midnight parts of the patriot act are likely to extend. the issue of the ability of the national security agency to tell telecom companies to giving over the phone records of millions of americans. let s say the government suspects jane doe being involved in terrorism. jane calls 10 people. the nsa using the vast amounts
i think the other question is, where is the money going to come from for these guys? will rick santorum get a white whale to help grow this campaign like did he last time? can they win the money race? that s one reason jeb, too, hasn t declared at this point. i ll do a quick subject change. turn to this heated debate over privacy. midnight parts of the patriot act are likely to extend. end unless the senate figures out a way to extend them or modify them before midnight. the issue of the ability of the national security agency to tell telecom companies to giving over the phone records of millions of americans. let s say the government suspects jane doe being involved in terrorism. jane calls 10 people. the nsa using the vast amounts of data they already collected contract the numbers of whom she called, when those called happened and how long the calls lasted. then if the nsa can prove a link to terror, it can access phone