gangs here have been competing to fill it and they operate with protection from political friends, there are people, powerful people in politics her both in government and in the opposition who human rights groups they use the gangs to serve their purpose is to either create electoral support, get control of an area or generate discontent in opposition to one of their rivals. powerful people in business are also accused of using the gangs as a tool from time to time. researchers say what has changed in the last ten years or so is that these links are of criminal organisations and corrupt politicians have become institutionalised and that the gangs, in a sense, used to subcontract people subcontract the gangs to provide political violence as and when they need it. just to give you a sense of how
The Finnish majority state-owned airline said yesterday it is looking to subcontract in-flight services on its routes to and from Thailand and the United States.
the government, citizens and others disseminating that information. i really believe this could be one of the most important cases in american history. rachel: i agree with that. my question is can the government, the federal government subcontract suppression, censorship, violation of the first amendment to a private company when you see this happening, what is this legally? where does this go? rachel: don t think you can deputize big tech firms like the police department can t deputize your neighbor to violate what they could not accomplish with a search warrant, this is the next, it is the existing battleground will fight for free speech but the next obvious battleground, the conversation about the role