some peeple. person and party meeting. for some people, that caucus tonight, nipping in long it lasts, ten minutes or so, the process leading up to the iowa caucus is a never ending one, isn t it? it caucus is a never ending one, isn t it? , ., ., isn t it? it is, here in iowa we asked isn t it? it is, here in iowa we asked rick isn t it? it is, here in iowa we asked rick to - isn t it? it is, here in iowa we asked rick to see - isn t it? it is, here in iowa - we asked rick to see candidates year before the caucus occurs, they come out and visit with newco party activists, people have been present for other caucuses and participate regularly to stop the might be people who can help on the candidate messages and candidates will see is this a place where i can actually float a viable campaign, and over the course leading up to the caucus state come up to iowa and i said the years leading up to the caucus is when we see candidates coming earnest. they are wobbly and new. so, over the
FactChecking Trump s Iowa Town Hall - FactCheck org
factcheck.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from factcheck.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
now he has a whole narrative around the prosecutions themselves. every single prosecution is part of his ongoing narrative of persecution. and the difference is how he s pregnanting that to the public. it s starting to be a pivot. it s not what we see in the stump speeches. we should also remember this. this campaign while these debates are great, donald trump s town hall was great, there are also going to be fought out in social media. so a lot of this debate will end up cut up into clips and put on instagram, put on twitter, people will never see the context of it. the biden campaign is reminding people that he says he s not chaos, but look at january 6th. he says he s not chaos, but he appointed the supreme court justices that got rid roe. so there will be enough evidence in the social media context to make the case.
i ll just read an excerpt, what they outline. they basically say that trump is prone to giving irrelevant speeches, he lacks self control, and is evasive to responding to questions, allow him to speak would invite more speeches, campaign style, that would disrupt the proceedings. i think that nails, that hits the nail on the in terms of while it s dangerous to give trump unfettered access in these court proceedings. does beg the question. this is an instance where the judge can say trump cannot trials. there will be more trials, or at least one or two, and there are going to be a lot more courthouse steps the trump faces. i think the question is, can the judicial system manage this process in a way that it does not become effectively a series of stump speeches for the trump candidacy? i think this is the bigger picture context it s relevant to 2024.