that is wild. [bleep] so we re seeing that now where we never saw that before, where people are going, enough. right. enough. stop shoving this down everybody s throat. rachel: the people are saying enough. i had tim kramer, he s an advertising executive, on my podcast this week, and i asked him, why would they do this? why would they make these moves knowing they re going to lose billions of dollars? and he said you really have to just peel this all the way back to the source, and it s esg, and that esg stuff isn t coming just from blackrock. behind that is the wef, the world economic forum. so these titans get together, they decide that this is the social justice, you know, things they want to push, and it just goes down from there. blackrock says this is what you have to do, state street says this is what you have to do, vanguard does, and they do what they have to do, and they don t care what s happening with their stock prices pete: equity index and all those
does suggest that, like, the republican assassination with this may not be paying the political dividends they may hope. rhonda sentences decline as a presidential candidate may indicate this. if there s any chance for introspection, it s gonna be because the stuff isn t really working the way they hoped it would work to win elections. and not to repeat myself too much, but i also think it s worth saying that part of the goal of this, talking about what fox part of the explicit goal of this is to take peoples civilians and remove it from the real questions of education. advocates funding for schools, making sure teachers are all qualified, making sure that there is educational infrastructure that can treat all students equally,
republican obsession with this may not be paying the political dividends they may hope. ron desantis s decline as a presidential candidate may indicate this. if there s any chance for introspection, it s gonna be because the stuff isn t really working the way they hoped it would work to win elections. and not to repeat myself too much, but i also think it s worth saying that part of the goal of this, talking about what fox part of the explicit goal of this is to take people s salience and remove it from the real questions of education. adequate funding for schools, making sure teachers are all qualified, making sure that there is educational infrastructure that can treat
the republican obsession with this may not be paying the kind of political dividends that they hope, and desantis recent decline as a presidential candidate might be evidence of that. if there s any cause for introspection, and i highly doubt we ll see much, it s going to be because this stuff isn t working the way they hoped it would work to win elections. just to repeat myself too much, but i also think it s worth saying that part of the i goal thisth talking about what fox s interest, talking about the republican party s interest, part of the explicit goal of this is take people s salience and remove it from the real questions of education adequate funding of schools, making sure teachers are qualified, making sure there s educational infrastructure that can treat all students equally, redirecting peoples anxieties
blows right past that and goes nope, that s still the guy. what do we need to understand about that symbiotic relationship at this point? some of it is, they re not saying the same thing. they live in a sort of media ecosystem where a lot of this stuff isn t talked about, and when it is talked about, it is framed in a way that people are coming after donald trump again. and on trump spent years and years conditioning people that the only reason they re coming after him is because he s fighting for them. and they hear that and they see it, they believe it. as you know, the biggest currency in the republican party these days is whose against you? who are your enemies? and when donald trump was able to say look at this liberal manhattan da coming after me, and george soros backed, all that language, it shows people okay, they re coming after him again because he s on the right