Here . I read it and looking at the image is that people are, are protesting against genocide and wanting piece. I mean, i dont think thats such a radical idea to protest about, but thats just me go ahead. Its not a radical idea to protest about this movement has been growing every day as the result of the interference by politicians. And by, i believe in organized movement against pulse time thats been operating for some time, even before the 7th of october. And according to that move 9, you know, people cannot say palestine, they cannot say into plaza, they cannot say from the river to the sea. Different states have lunches, flimsier gloss, allowing businesses to fire employees who are caught speaking out on palestine. So i think this is part of something larger, and the Student Movement is acting on uh, you know, it is triggered by what is happening to so. So here in berkeley, we had a dean of the law school who had are a student that were in his job, who stood up to speak at a dinn
Quite on the other side of that. Yeah. All the, yeah, has become more depended on price here. American liquefied natural gas. Oh, and francis own elegy, imports from russia are now up 75 percent in the 1st few months of this year compared to a year ago. So i guess my call figures that people are so stupid that if he just says something enough times like in the speech, theyll just simply accept it all as objective reality before i begin to service them, is that the top of the agenda, the for of in st. Petersburg as representatives of the country from around the world have gathered to address Global Security issues. We have to also speak with the m. M by so thats a russia, yes, as long as the importance of Cyber Security in combating terrorism. In particular, in this confidence uh the, uh, i should, uh was uh, focusing on uh much as of uh, the new Technology Aspects and uh the, uh, what the things of the challenges. And thats why it would have some discussion about the site for security,
To score based. I think we need to protect our 1000000 miles. So thats when we actually import those mean that as we can put them at our own times, more of a, of a tens of other countries. Well that route. So this is as always displayed, type, your company hit on all the international, do check out all t dot com, a lot of analysis that you and we will see it in about 30 minutes. The, [000 00 00;00] the hello and welcome to cross stock. Were all things are considered on theater, live out among the casualties as a result of israels genocidal assault on causes included suspension of International Humanitarian law, but also free speech across the western world. Perversely, being pro palestinian and pro peace is condemned as anti semitic. The Cross Section in palestine, im joined by my guess, lionel in new york. Hes a legal in media analyst in berkeley. We actually but so what i see is the director of the institute of middle eastern is la mac and strategic studies and and roll. We crossed t
That may be true. But for america, i dont think america is going to get what it wants out of iraq or has gotten what it wants out of iraq. And certainly not at the cost and i dont mean financial, in terms of American Interest and the number of dead and wounded we had from the conflict. For america, its never going to have been worth it. I think when it comes to iran, we have to look at these things i touched upon. But i think we cant obsess about one thing or another and have to really think about whether we as a country want to forget about the hostage crisis, have the iranians forget about 1953 and move forward and say, look, we will recognize your grievances, you recognize our grievances. We recognize we will never have complete agreement on everything, but there are areas where we do have agreement where we do think we can come to some sort of agreement. And those are whether its syria, whether its lebanon, iraq afghanistan. Where we could actually sit down and negotiate with the i
And jailing dissidents and bloggers and journalists will turn to its historic enemies and treat them with magnanimity. Its a silly contention. But that said, i think the way that the issue was used in the soviet context was that it was a tool to help bring about the end of the soviet union, not merely to contain the soviet union, but to end the soviet union and so, too, it can be used in the iranian context. When you look at the boldness of someone like senator jackson who confronted the soviet union and directly linked most favored nation status to improvements in human rights and free immigration, that was a tool which drove the soviets absolutely crazy, and if you read the memoirs of any of these guys, you see when carter and reagan would bring up the names of dissidents, they really, really hated it, and i think thats one sign that its the right approach. I think that human rights is actually a real achilles heel of the Iranian Regime because they are dependent upon external actors