potential student. quote, our community service initiative is funded by the redacted foundation. this is the daughter. and the follow-up email says that student got admitted. the attorney who made the filing told the l.a. times, quote, the records prove the existence of a university-wide program at usc where past donations, pledges of tuch donations, or expectation of future donations based on the university s belief in a parent s resources deeply affects the chances for a perspective student s admission. now, a spokeswoman for usc who had the most people tied up in the college scam said it s no secret that certain students could get flagged for special attention but that alone doesn t decide who s gets admitted and called this a fishing expedition. this is giving a peek into how they re going to fight these charges. i think that s important. we ve all always suspected this is how it works behind the scenes but to see it in black and white is different. thank you very much.
and writes for the new york times magazine, lives at yale, why her byline, a mistake. should have had a different reporter stand by the story, but they stand by it. why conservatives are upset about it. that acknowledgement is preci precisely what they re talking about. how is president trump going to respond to this story? this story gets at the heart of his story to the public. i can t imagine he s not going to attack the times. say it s not true. i mean, this is going to be gris for the mill? i suspect go down the media bias route as a public facing matter. my advice, let your lawyers handle it. told the new york times they dispute all this and investigations and legal issues. as in most cases, let the lawyers handle that stuch. y stuff. want to say media is out to get conservatives, a fine strategy. don t wade into that. get yourself in trouble via twitter. is it fodder for democrats? something the democrats can use
compromise, even if we think we would have struck the compromise in a different place. as judges, that s not really our role. as a formal and functional matter, i think it s important to stick to the text. there are canons of interpretation which owe kag cause you to super impose a presumption on the text. otherwise, sticking to what you passed is important. you certainly consider yourself a textualist. if you follow justice kagan s statement, we are all textualists now. that s what judging is? judging is paying attention to the text. in starch other cases, paying attention to the text of the stuch, informed by those canons of instruction, presumption of men men rea, things like that. some of the things are not so settled, which is a whole separate half hour of discussion. how does textualism differ
injured. so as you mentioned, the death toll, the 22 people dead, that is expected to rise. investigators are peeling away the layers of the bridge. they re attempting to rescue survivors from really the dozens of cars that were seen falling. you re looking at some of this dramatic video. among the potential victims may be some of the rescue workers. as you can see, the images are showing rescue workers desperately trying to extract people from cars and buildings crushed beneath this bridge. it is incredibly dangerous work. alongside the human cost, the political fallout is likely to be huge. poor infrastructure has been a topic in elections as it is in the united states. some politicians are trading blame for the tragedy, even as the dust is settling. matt bradley, thank you for that report. appreciate it. we ll continue to stay in tuch wi touch with you on the breaking news. after peter strzok was fired by the fbi, there is fallout.
of this stuch is fake. a some point, why doesn t it move the needles, who are the republicans so mad at. that donald trump could shoot someone on fifth avenue, and not lose votes. something that he did. people interpret it how you feel about donald trump. you offer a negative statement. people will agree with that statement. people will like him will disagree. they aren t prosystems being it they have a pre-existing opinion about donald trump, applying that to their evaluation. the russia investigation is extremely important. our relationship with russia. it doesn t seem to be something that moves public opinion that much. the president s poll numbers, extremely stable.