President zelensky decided that they were not going to issue thatt statement that Rudy Giuliani wanted to include burisma in the 2016 elections, there was no white house meeting. It soon became clear to them that the Security Assistance was also at risk. And that took on a renewed importance for them. Well, following the 25th call, the t july 25th call, ambassador sondland and volker worked closely with mr. Giuliani and the ukrainians to help draft a statement that the president could make, president zelensky. Wasnt that right . Yes. And the report said they worked closely and there were also phone calls with the white house around the same time that they werear working closely. Do you know what that statement was supposed tou say according to mr. Giuliani and the u. S. Officials . Well, the key difference is that it had to include that ukraine would do the investigations of burisma which equalled theic Biden Investigatn in the 2016 ukraine
interference. But was there concern about doi
found in his two and a half years, do you think there is any circumstance in which he could see probable cause or whatever that standard is to investigate this president? it s a great question. he probably will find a way to avoid answering the question for the rest ofan his time in offic. and the president s tenure, it s a low standard. is there a reasonable basis for opening anbl investigation? are there articulable facts? that s not ae close call here.o in the mueller report you see it laid out. in horowitz s report you see it laid out. we should ve beent fired if we didn t investigate this given what we learned. and whether the attorney general accepts it or not the truth is a stubborn thing.e and the fbi in the long run will be fined because it s that committed toec that truth. do you see the resistance to facts and evidence and witness testimony of clearly a quid pro quo? it looksar a little bit more li extortion in the impeachment investigations that were conducted by the ho