he wrote that mitt romney carried the majority of every economic group except those with less than $50,000 a year in household income. that means he carried the majority of middle class voters. stuart is pretty far off base with this claim. there are a number of ways to define the middle class. the fact is median household income currently just over $50,000. we will never forget the 47% or when romney said president obama gave out gifts to win the election and even three weeks after the election, romney s campaign continues to prove just how out of touch they really are as to why they lost. for more, let s turn to bob shrump. good to have you with us tonight. glad to be here. you bet. this meeting tomorrow, it is rather lincolnesque of president obama to do this, to bring in someone totally opposite of him when it comes to ideology and thinking about how to run the country. is this going to be a serious discussion or is this just a
dream tomorrow. he is going to walk into the white house, not the way he wanted it. president obama is keeping a promise he made on election night by having a private lunch with romney on thursday. a few weeks ago, president obama said romney could actually bring something to the table. i do think he did a terrific job running the olympics. that skill set applies to the federal government. turns out, romney doesn t have an eye on helping the country. he is helping to move on into an office at his son, tag s private equity firm. it is unclear what role he will be playing. he spenlt the last seven years running to serve his country and now he is going back to the private sector. he is not out serving the public or helping the country move forward. this just underscores everything we thought about mitt romney. all he cares about is money. good for him. romney campaign strategist, stuart citi venstevens is compl about the loss.