you got hit hard for saying members of it needed to be purged. is this letter and stonewalling we are learning about vindication for you of your position on that? well, i am really glad to see chairman nunes as well as senator grassley turn up the heat on these investigations because evidently the people who testified before were less than forthcoming. we have got to get to the bottom of what was going on with that dossier and what this people like this strzok guy and ohr were doing which like what was texted. why ohr was meeting with fusion gps. that stuff shouldn t be happening in impartial bureaucracy. rachel: doesn t mueller have a responsibility. especially because he came in as a friend of comey to have done a better job
all about and we don t have evidence this infiltrated. why if there s no evidence this has infiltrated this investigation would you be calling for a purge which is a word, an action more closely associated with authortarian governments than democratic ones like the one you re a part of it. if you ve got 2% bad apples like this strzok guy and orr, it s incumbent again, one removed one demoted. he s demoted but still has a lot of authority in the other job he has. he s still just as lacks impash alt and is very aggressive in his views. but there s no evidence that has impacted the work. we don t know what the guy might have been able to impact in his great amount of authority he has as an fbi agent. i worry about people that have
you are going to investigate the guy who won the election according to the rules of the election, you had better be seen to do it in a clean way as possible. you don t do it by appointing psychologically weird people who think they are somehow top supersecret agents who have been put on earth to save the republic, like this strzok guy. you don t do it by involving people whose lives worked for hillary clinton s opposition research team. you don t do it by hiring people who went to hillary clinton s nonvictory party on november the eighth. everything that mueller has done discredits his own reputation and discredits his own investigation. tucker: by my count, you ve got 9 out of 15 investigators so far having donated to democratic
on so much. as you pointed out, those tweets and texts between strzok and his lover, it sounds like john rewritten by team. it s preposterous. the half of the country that voted for trump won t accept a verdict against him. likewise, the other half will not accept if mueller exonerates trump, they will say that is just because the republicans demonized him and trashed him. mueller has killed the whole point of this investigation. tucker: you are exactly right. the whole point of independent counsel investigations is toti reassure. mark, thank you for that, as always. thanks a lot, tucker. sorry i got worked up about it. tucker:rr [laughs] i love it! harvard university is this country s most impressive university. there s literally no chance youy could have gotten in, but is it practicing racism, and does the school have racial quotas to keep asians out? we will talk to someone who has the numbers on that next. next.
doj and fbi, whether you want to call it deep state or what are off the rails when you look at what that strzok guy was texting the orr talking about the clinton op research people and this mccabe wife takes $600,000 from clinton-related source while he s running for state senator. well, congressman, you just called the fbi tapped doj off the rails. fundamentally, how is that something that you are okay with talking about here, how does that not sort of undermine the work that these agencies are doing? i think the american people have very high standards for our government agencies and to see people like these examples those aforementioned examples are nerve racking to me, it undermined my confidence that the agency don t respect the constitution and will not put the ends before the means. i would like to see the