if you ve been studying foreign policy, you ve been thinking about it for a dozen years. do you think that this i mean, this latest, that trurp would use rubio as the top nonolder challenger? i happen to think it is probably correct. because i think rubio, on paper, has the best prerntsation to face. say a hillary clinton for the republican side.
no nojs of any issues associated with the group or their chairman, joel aarons. trurp also claims to have not taken a single penny from that event. so, i mean, if this group is not legitimate and they re hosting some sort of a fundraiser to the tune of a thousand bucks a ticket, there s a problem. there is a problem. i mean, i ve been involved with veteran s nonprofits for a better part of nine years of my career. there s a lot of regulations that go with run ining a 501 (c. these are advocacy organizations on issues, not just endorsing. if you you can, but if it s the primary thing of what you re doing, you re going to run into
with the group or their chairman, joel aarons. trurp also claims to haveot taken a single penny from that event. so i mean, if this group is not legitimate and they re hosting some sort of a fundraiser to the tune of a thousand bucks a ticket there s a problem. there is a problem. i mean i ve been involved with veteran s nonprofits for a better part of nine years of my career. there s a lot of regulations that go with run ingning a 501 (c)4. these are advocacy organizations on issues, not just endorsing. if you you can, but if it s the primary thing of what you re doing, you re going to run into issues. this is a marriage of convenience.
2008. and we i think are both fascinated and appalled in the press when we see this going on. of course if trump s on your broadcast, trump s in my newspaper, more people are going to be interested in that. so it s almost a guilty pleasure in a sense. but it s not as if the media is propping up an obscure candidate. this is not just nominally, but in a real sense, the republican frontrunner. it seems to be an impossibility that certainly nobody convicted. it s made it a very compelling story to cover. they say people like you, people like me, we have some sort of establishment bias for the way it used to be, and thus there is an argument put forward that the media is uncomfortable with anyone routing around that. the public, not just with trurp, clearly there s a political appetite for people who aren t doing it the normal way.
both partys have really tried to crack down op the number of debates. so you don t have what the republicans had last time around. i understand why they re doing it. martin o malley is going to try to get any opening he can. he s completely lost that position, the anti hillary position to bernie sanders. the republicans thought they would limit the number of debates because of what happened last time. now if trurp stays in the lead, a lot of republicans are going to want more debates. dana millbank thanks for joining us. i want to turn now to the nooik deal with iran. the senate expected to hold that procedural vote on it. the house planning three votes by the opposition to stop it. joining us now with the inside scoop from congress, peter welsh of vermont who does support this deal. good day to you. good afternoon. we saw those massive crowds outside the capital for that tea party rally against this deal.