unlike any other i have met in the field of work, especially in syria. he has been one of our first recruited investigators. they have secured over 1 million pages of the documents produced by the regime itself and that is something unheard of. reporter: the troves of evidence secured by mustafa played a key role in landmark trials including the case in the u.s. of slain journal marie coleman versus the republic. his contribution has already been enormous. he never lost sight of what it was all for and despite all the hardships he and his family have been through, he never gave up. he never lost hope and he never lost track of why he was doing what he was doing. reporter: three years ago mustafa and his family had to leave their beloved homeland. we helped move mustafa and his family into turkey, not only because of the security threats that he had faced, but
administration and proven fact. so, it is a wink and a nod. he can pledge that he won t interfere all he wants, but there is no reason why the u.s. attorney in delaware should be sitting on this case for well over a year. it is very clear to me as someone a man of the criminal division of the fbi and former prosecutor before i went in the fbi, that they have the evidence. whatever evidence they have, they are just sitting on it. they are delaying decision and round the clock out here. they need to make a prosecutor decision. he can force that prosecuted decision and doesn t have to dictate what it is, but he can force them to make a prosecuted decision instead of just sitting on it. todd: chris, you meant nailed the key point, you have grassley s whistle-blowers and troves and troves of evidence a lot of which we disclosed on the program. you have to imagine there is more stuff behind the scenes. why is it taking so long to potentially charge hunter?
prosecutors have to make that evidence accessible. is it that simple in this case? yeah, so, erica, it s certainly very unusual to have a sitting member of congress providing troves of information to large groups of criminal defendants. that said, there s nothing necessarily wrong with it. every prosecutor in every case has an affirmative obligation to hand over all the evidence against the defendant, especially evidence that may be helpful to that defendant. that s an obligation i m sure doj is taking seriously by all indications they have satisfied those obligations on these january 6 cases. every defendant in any case has the right to get that evidence and to do his or her own investigation and gather whatever information they can do. if they re going to congress, if congress is making information available to these defendants, they should take advantage of that. the thing that respected is the limits on the information that might pose a security risk. we did see the january 6th
providing lethal support. reporter: china denies it calling the claims unfounded, a ploy, a smear. beijing and moscow declared a no limits partnership last year. cnn obtained a new report showing moscow may already be getting a boost on the battlefield from beijing. troves of trade data, collected and supplied by the center for advanced studies, a d.c. think tank that shows china sending russian defense companies sophisticated parts. we see the nature of these parts being labeled for use in military systems. reporter: cnn did not verify the data showing a steady supply of parts, dramatically increasing after the invasion. they could be helping russia resupply. rotors for attack helicopter, radar antenna parts for anti-aircraft missile systems sent to a russian defense company labeled for military use, the think tank says. their data shows military
they precluded me from watching what they did. but at this point i don t think they would even go to the extent of trying to plant information. i think they just make stuff up and come up with whatever they want. that s the way that they ll have to proceed in order to try to indict the president, because they don t have anything. there s just nothing there. let me just repeat that for you. they don t have anything. there s just nothing there. now christina bobb, you may remember, is a lawyer who unfortunately for her signed a 2022 statement claiming that all of trump s classified material had been turned over to the justice department. a statement, again, that she signed, ultimately proven the opposite of true when the fbi searched trump s property in august and found additional troves of classified material. but as we later learned the statement itself was actually drafted by the other lawyer, adam corcoran. that s not great work, christina bobb. now he s pushing to have