i don t agree. this this after a group of asian-american students filed complaint against harvard and the university of north carolinaa hill, alleging that ta they failed to employ racet neutral admissions practices. now the majority opinion delivered, chief justice john roberts said that any studenn t, quote, must be treat based on his or her experiencebs . an individual not on the basis of race, highlighting the importance of this case in a rare move. noarw justices clarence thomas d and sonia sotomayor also and actually read their opinions from the bench now, with justice thomas declaring, quote, at alnow l forms discrimination based on race, including so-called action, areo prohibited under the u.s. co. titutionhi now, a harvard did, in fact, release a statement following the decision acknowledging that the court ruled their admissions policies did not comply with the 14th amendment, the equal protection clause in the constitution and the civil rights act. but harvar la
and ramblings and rantings and mumbling and bumbling. and stumbling. you decide. take a look. todatake ay the court once again prlked away from decades of maecedent and. may, as the dissent hades madehf clear, the court has effectively endefed affirmative action in college admissions. and i strongl y, strongly disagree with the court s decision. the truth is, we all kno courw it. discrimination still exists in america. discrimination still exists in america. discriminationmination still stn america. today s decision does not change that. you know, i know today s court decision is a severe disappointment courtn so many . including me. but we cannot let the decision be a permanent setback for the country. now, it was not justtry. joe bide joen who had a meltdown over the court s ruling. the left, the mob, the medias ot made one outlandish comment after another. take a look at thih co s. . the supreme court of the united states is stomping of the on dre our young people. this wa