Compliant issues and just what attention is being paid in that area . Mr. Rademaker . Israel is obviously concerned about the Iranian Nuclear program and with good reason. Iran and iranian need leaders have made comments about how israel should be wiped from the face of the earth or wiped off the map of the earth. So for a country like israel thats obviously alarming that you have those kinds of statements coupled with technological activity that seems aimed at producing a Nuclear Weapon which would enable them to do precisely what they are saying they would like to see happen. So the United States has a lot to be worried about and irans other neighbors in the Persian Gulf Region have a lot to be worried about. Israel has a lot to be worried about. Israel is paying a lot of attention to this problem. My understanding is theres a great deal of apprehension and israel about the current course of the diplomacy. As i said earlier its eyes been possible to negotiate a deal with iran just ag
Prior planning . Thats right. Okay so the additional half cent is like 1. 7 million . The additional half cent will be directly on the general fund about 1 dot 4 or 1 dot 5 million for electricity and in addition the mayors proposal full reimbursement then the additional cost to go solar . The additional cost to go solar would be to go solar would be 3 million a year over the next 2 years. Okay so basically most of the half cent goes to go solar . Thats the equivalent, yeah. Thank you. So again shows the dramatic improvement compared to what we started with back in february and it was also with difficult choices so just to be able to assume the one penny over the next 3 years and a half a penny a penny as well as to update it to reflect the Third Quarter Strong Reserve thats slightly more than 15 percent. Sorry stuck on that question so you dont need to attribute a certain pot of money for a program like go go solar that doesnt go back and benefit the public dollar if you will . I know
Next week on may 21st and and also may 28th and well have the boards budget hearings and review the budget now in detail with the boards budget budget analysts and the Financial Plan as a number of sheets included in it going through all the various scenarios and so that when we do we do go to the bond market, we go through all the key risks as well as all the key, flexibilities that we have in the enterprise. Summarized on page 8 and also the solving of a very large fiscal imbalances and the Key Assumptions are on page 8 and they do include one example of a revision that id like to make administratively if you so authorize in your amendment to update the capital plan increase to reflect the the 155 million worth of reductions and assume power Revenue Bonds over the 10 years as well as the one penny reductions and then level out towards about a half a penny and to the degree rate increases are more than half a penny that would allow us to add back some of the cut capital or reduced cap
Half of that was part of the prior planning . Thats right. Okay so the additional half cent is like 1. 7 million . The additional half cent will be directly on the general fund about 1 dot 4 or 1 dot 5 million for electricity and in addition the mayors proposal full reimbursement then the additional cost to go solar . The additional cost to go solar would be to go solar would be 3 million a year over the next 2 years. Okay so basically most of the half cent goes to go solar . Thats the equivalent, yeah. Thank you. So again shows the dramatic improvement compared to what we started with back in february and it was also with difficult choices so just to be able to assume the one penny over the next 3 years and a half a penny a penny as well as to update it to reflect the Third Quarter Strong Reserve thats slightly more than 15 percent. Sorry stuck on that question so you dont need to attribute a certain pot of money for a program like go go solar that doesnt go back and benefit the publi
The senate, it would be our belief that this would have greater practical appeal to our leaders. And so we think this approach would enable us to reach unanimous consent as to an initial set of relevant amendments to be considered so that we could then move forward expeditiously when the senate turns to the bill. I hope our colleagues will help us in this matter. I think its in everybodys interest, its in the National Security interest that we have a bill before us. We have to pass a bill in order to go to conference with the house or else were put in the same kind of position we were in last year, where we just simply present what amounted to a conference report before a bill had ever been really debated in the senate. We and our staff, working with colleagues, put together what amounted to a conference report which was not a conference report in technical terms but was in effect the work product of both the senate and the house and our committees by the process of negotiation. So our