as the person best suited to get donald trump. that violates all the strictures in jackson s ten commandments for prosecutors and all the norms prosecutors recognize. jerry: i thought if you re going to form a president in a case that is political you better have very very solid evidence of serious offense. even the falsification, he was complicit in the payment but where s the evidence he directed on the books of his company. didn t think he got involved in the green eye shade part of the business. paul: what are the applications longer-term? you sat on the seat, you have to take these things into consideration all the time. what are the implications, the
grievances. there s a district attorney in athens often invoked because she refuses to enforce low level derog offenses and they believe she s inept and effective as a prosecutor. there s also a white republican from out in west georgia, a former district attorney from a county, an ex-urban county who pleaded guilty to misconduct charges and had to step down, so he s often invoked. they re very careful about not bring up donald trump, but again it s impossible to disinantal him from this entire debate. and presumably there are rules and strictures in place in georgia like there are in georgia like every other state to handle issues of prosecutorial overreach. it s not like georgia has an unusual lacuna in its legal system where prosecutors are less comfortable for things they legitimately do wrong compared to other states, right? that s exactly right.
The Delhi High Court has expunged the remarks passed by the trial court against the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) of North East Delhi, and also recalled the bailable warrant issued against him.
classroom in florida. you can t talk about subjects that might make people feel guilty or that might invoke the notion that people are responsible for actions by their, people, their forbearers, by white people, you know, say, centuries ago. that those last to the present day. that these things are entrenched irreservably in our culture. outlawing those prings raises all the questions how you can teach a subject like ap african american history, which concepts may bump up against those strictures. look, college board and many credible scholars associated creating the curriculum are quite incentive this did not guide their decision-making. the thing about censorship, it s insidious. you may not even know consciously that you are writing something a certain way or leaving something out or adding something in.
world markets that defaulting on the debt is. they could say, okay, we ll go ahead and raise the debt limit, but we re going to have a fight when it comes to spending. that s what joe biden has asked and take that case to the american people and see how the american people respond. ben, let s go back to 2011. that led to the s&p downgrading the u.s. credit rating for the first and only time. we should mention, congress has intervened 78 times to change the debt limit since the 60s. how damaging could this be this time around and do you see it being as bad as or worse than 2011? i believe i do worry about it more than 2011 just because of all of the strictures that speaker mccarthy agreed to in order to get the gavel, including not passing a clean debt limit increase. how does mccarthy do that and still stay speaker?