decision. rarely if ever do they prosecute in the first place. but never goes before the grand jury. we re arguing about something that s very rarely ever used. the only thing that happened here is the option was taken away. but in terms of its practically in california, the grand jury is rarely used in police shooting cases. and i don t believe it undermines the system because witnesses testify in cases all the time. they re subject to subpoena powers by the courts. so you don t really have this problem. i think this is just a straw horse being placed out there that is totally unnecessary. as a practical matter, the d.a. makes the decision. may not always agree with the d.a. but it s their power and you have the political recourse if they don t, in fact, prosecute when they should. john, thank you so much for your time. we greatly appreciate your insight on this one. coming up, doctors are trying to figure out treatment options for president jimmy carter. the 90-year-old revealed
there, but their country needs to deal with. we ve got to pay the piper sometime and put those cuts out there, instead of putting out the straw horse of obamacare. i know you quit the moral victory of going against it, but you know politically your view cannot pass. why go for those other spending cuts? i know the president and democrats like to say they re repercussions for an election. let s go back to the 2010 election. that was right after obamacare passed. when nancy pelosi said we have to fas to find out what s in it. in 2011 we had sweeping changes in the house of representatives. some say let s go for majority rule. three time, i m anticipating that this bill will pass when we vote on it in the next hour, that three times the house will affirmatively pass a provision that keeps government open and makes some small adjustments. i think a small adjustment in delaying the individual mandate which they ve already done for