Thank you. Volume 2, page 76, correct . Ill leave the answer to our report. So thats a yes . Is it true your investigation did not establish that any members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the russian government in election interference activity, volume 1, page 2. Volume 1, page 73 . Yes. Thank you. Although your Report States collusion is not a specific offense and you said that this morning or a term of our in federal criminal law and experience is, in the colloquial context are collusion and experience essentially synonymous terms. Youre going to have to row peat that for me. Collusion is not a specific offense or a term of art in federal criminal law. Conspiracy is. In the colloquial context, collusion and conspiracy are essentially synonymous terms, correct . No. If no on page 180 of volume 1 of your report you wrote collusion is largely synonymous of conspiracy and that crime is set forth in the general conspiracy statute. You said at your May 29th Press Conf
is why evidence of possible obstruction is serious. to what extent did the russian government interfere in the 2016 presidential election? could you repeat that, miami? to what extent did the russian government interfere in the 2016 presidential election? well, particularly when i came to computer crimes and the like the government was implicated. so you wrote in volume 1 that the russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion. you also described in your report that the then trump campaign chairman paul manafort shared with a russian operative kilimnik the campaign strategy for winning democratic votes in midwestern states and internal pollingidate ow of the campaign. isn t that correct? correct. they also discussed the status of the trump campaign and manafort s strat aenl for