The colorblind principle . Yes. So theres been a lot of confusion about what the word colorblindness mean. Many people think that colorblindness means pretend you dont. But in my book, i try to get rid of that perception because we all see race. Everyone sees race and help it. Everyone watching this notices that i am of color and and so forth. So with the knowledge that we can all see race, were all capable of racial bias. What i mean by colorblindness book is that we try our best to treat people without regard to race, both in our lives. The less controversial piece and in our Public Policy. Thats what i mean by colorblind. One of the reasons the notion colorblindness has become so contrived racial seems to be rooted in what is broadly understood as antiracism, which you also define as near racism. You discuss two of the most high profile proponents of that ideology. Robin dangelo and max kendi. What is an antiracism or near racism, and how did it become so influential . So what is to
The colorblind principle . Yes. So theres been a lot of confusion about what the word colorblindness mean. Many people think that colorblindness means pretend you dont. But in my book, i try to get rid of that perception because we all see race. Everyone sees race and help it. Everyone watching this notices that i am of color and and so forth. So with the knowledge that we can all see race, were all capable of racial bias. What i mean by colorblindness book is that we try our best to treat people without regard to race, both in our lives. The less controversial piece and in our Public Policy. Thats what i mean by colorblind. One of the reasons the notion colorblindness has become so contrived racial seems to be rooted in what is broadly understood as antiracism, which you also define as near racism. You discuss two of the most high profile proponents of that ideology. Robin dangelo and max kendi. What is an antiracism or near racism, and how did it become so influential . So what is to
Without electricity, as you understand, it is impossible. According to the president , russia was forced to respond to ukrainian attacks on russian nfz in kiev. Apparently, they thought that this game could be played alone, but it turned out that it was not. The president , at the same time, noted that in winter it is humanitarian. To answer, i want to emphasize that even for humanitarian reasons, we did not carry out any strikes in the winter, meaning that we did not want to leave social institutions, hospitals, etc. Without power supply, but after a series of attacks on our Energy Facilities were forced to respond, but i repeat once again, if all this leads to the resolution of those issues about which. Perhaps this is the renewal of the istanbul agreement with kiev, although this format, as putin said, ukraine 2 years ago, threw it in the trash. Then moscow withdrew its troops from kiev to consolidate the agreements with a key point. At that time ukraine had a neutral nonaligned sta
So, in thinking about this event and in what we wanted to accomplish here, what we set out to do was to have Larry Summers make the case why we should think about this, have a number of very experienced monetary economists who have views about what we should do, think about what we should do. In this panel, the question was, could we get some people to some very different points of view, to talk about, what difference does this really make . Is this worth the energy we spend on it and to whom does it matter . So we have a deliberately diverse panel. John taylor from stanford, wellknown for his taylor rule, thinking about Monetary Policy for a long time. Christian forbes from mit, until recently on the Monetary Policy committee of the bank of england, correct me if i am wrong, you never had a chance to raise rates, is that right . Right. You tried. Peter hooper chief economist of Deutsche Bank securities and writing about the relationship between the fed and the congress only briefly me
What we should do. In this panel, the question was, could we get some people to some very different points of view, to talk about, what difference does this really make . Is this worth the energy we spend on it and to whom does it matter . So we have a deliberately diverse panel. John taylor from stanford, wellknown for his taylor rule, thinking about Monetary Policy for a long time. Christian forbes from mit, until recently on the Monetary Policy committee of the bank of england, correct me if i am wrong, you never had a chance to raise rates, is that right . Right. You tried. Peter hooper chief economist of Deutsche Bank securities and writing about the relationship between the fed and the congress only briefly mention this morning but is relevant given after the Federal Reserve exists because congress created it. As we know legs, what congress created it can take away, sarah and her colleague have a book out called the myth of independence tracing the history to congress. I will ask