and that is why she took to a trump world lawyer who lied to her according to her testimony. a trump lawyer who lied to her about perjury and pressured her to commit perjury, and, effects according to a testimony. 49 years ago. there was another stark witness investigation who testified, under, oath like cassidy hutchinson against republican president who served in the white house. that happened 22 years before cassidy hutchinson was brought in. and in her darkest hour that start with this is testimony from the president he served. became her guiding light. page 80. so as i m driving up to
committee report in the history of house congressional committee reports. that is what we now have in our hands, tonight. that report would not be what it is, and would not have the import that it has without the testimony of the star witness to that committee. today, the january six committee released the transcript of the most important testimony. the committee has received. the most important ones. 26-year-old cassidy hutchinson. the committee is found not a shred of evidence to, it anyway, reduce what appears to be the solemn credibility of the committee start witness, cassidy hutchinson. and we learned in her full testimony released today, that the first lawyer who
represented her, and dealings with the committee. will face disbarment proceedings in washington d. c.. and will face prosecution for supporting perjury if costly hutchinson s testimony is removed. today, that lawyer whose possible criminal conduct was exposed and a costly hutchison sets money today. issuing a statement that said he didn t nothing wrong but he is resigning from his washington law firm. because of the release of that testimony. and we now know, they cast hutchinson decided to tell the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. because she was inspired by someone who appeared on this program discussing her toes testimony. in her testimony, cassidy hutchinson says that the first lawyer who represented her
doesn t need directions. they can public by their own way with a roadmap. but the information and the evidence is incredibly helpful, especially when you break it down into those elements and those building blocks but the justice department, and you know, say here you go! it may be that this department is able to do more than the committee did, but it s all in the case that the justice department has a bigger burden because they were a few things absence from the committee had to do. number one, there was no defense attorney there to cross examine any of these witnesses so they need to do that work themselves. put them in the ground jury, play devils advocate, they ll push and prod, make sure that they understand how these witnesses know these things. they have to comply with the rules of evidence. here, we have heard a lot of hearsay, which is fine. it s a good way to start a story, but you can t use that in a court. you have to assure that up. for example, the story cassidy hutch
is also the case that the justice department has a bigger burden because there were a few things absent from what the committee had to do. you know, number one, there was no defense attorney there to cross-examine any of these witnesses so they need to do that work themselves and put them in the grand jury and play devil s advocate and push and product and make sure they understand how they know these things and comply with the rules of evidence. here we heard a lot of hearsay which is fine and a good way to start a story. but you can t use that in a court. you d have to shore that up. you know, for example, the story cassidy hutchinson tells about what happened in the beast, you would need people firsthand witnesses to that story to be able to tell that story. and finally we didn t really hear any of the defenses. what would be the defense story. what would the defendant say in opening and closing arguments? is there some sort of intent that sun able to be proved here? so those are th