and other issues to deal with. because we are talking about a former president and because w are talking about donald trump the former president - so, he has security needs, legitimately, because he is former president so - there will have to be some goo faith conversation about wit the secret service about how t bring him in in a way that i safe for him and say for the courthouse but that all seems to me really, doable, alex how does that work, though? if their responsibility is protecting someone 24/7, how d you bring someone in to ge arraigned? we have never, obviously, had this situation before yeah, yeah! but people with massive security needs have been prosecuted in open court o much more serious charges. you know, i m thinking about terrorists, right? and so i m not worried about that that just seems like a logistical problem that need to be worked out between the d s office in the nypd and th secret service i think the harder questions
yeah, so, we have lots of reason to think that he is close to the end i think it s actually even possible that he got a indictment and hasn t filed it yet, which sort of starts th process of an arrest or surrender. but even if he hasn t, it seem like he has put in all of hi main witnesses, and the gran jury will just have to vote on what is a relatively straightforward indictment and really a single charge and then there are the securit and other issues to deal with. because we are talking about a former president and because w are talking about donald trump the former president - so, he has security needs, legitimately, because he is former president so - have to be some good faith conversation about with th secret service about how t bring him in in a way that i safe for him and say for the courthouse but that all seems to me really, doable, alex how does that work, though? if their responsibility is
attorney client relationship then he can t represent donald trump. that s a textbook example of a conflict of interest ms. daniels could well be prosecution witness agains trump. trump s defense cross-examine her. the defense attorney could potentially use confidential information he learned fro stormy daniels when he was considered handling her case that violates the ethics law of new york state, as well a barr rules none of this seems like a positive legal development for the former president, right? there is - you know, rumors swirl about the timing of potentia criminal charges it could happen in the next fe days it could be catastrophic t lose your council in advance o that or to have him so compromised. for people who don t understan what is happening right now, what is the manhattan da tryin to sort through at the stage o the game as we talk about the sort of precipice into indictment land
thank you coming up, the u.s. capitol police have some facts to clea up about now speaker kevin mccarthy s decision to giv those surveillance tapes fro january 6th to tucker carlson. we ll have more on that, ahead but first, president trump received a lot of gifts from a lot of foreign leaders durin his time in office what happened to all of them that s next. when it comes to reducing sugar in your family s diet, the more choices, the better. that s why america s beverage companies are working together to deliver more great tasting options with less sugar or no sugar at all. in fact, today, nearly 60% of beverages sold contain zero sugar. different sizes? check. clear calorie labels? just check. with so many options, it s easier than ever to find the balance that s right for you. more choices. less sugar. balanceus.org family is just very important. she s my sister and, we depend on each other a lot. she s the rock of the family. she s the person who holds everything together.
formulate its response to this in a way that is not a lie i wish that they were jus trying to let it go away but they re trying to bring it back up, and that s my biggest problem. it wasn t even a cleve argument that tucker carlson made we have heard this from some cookie house republicans before, this wasn t a big deal i don t know who you are tryin to convinced that this wasn t big deal, other than people wh only live in that sort of medi bubble on the right or peopl who are die hard for donal trump. you just look silly trying t say that this was not a bi deal maybe worse than silly you look craven in some ways but at the end of the day yeah this is not going away it s still front and center fo a long time, and if your position as a party that thi was okay, look, what happene with these videos, the rea risk here, i don t think his security i think it s a propaganda. it s convincing people that yo