at when she shares her information with congress. let me push you a little more, they re pointing a finger at le cord. they re saying there is a false cover story. they re saying it goes higher, and if i remember correctly i think the fox story suggested as high as mur dodoch that s why i make the connection, and it helped the silencing of this come to life. this segment is about fox news and not the wall street journal. but it is also about the efforts of a former reporter to break her silence and come forward. they have it or they don t, right? if they can t prove it and they re just making wild allegations, then it kind of goes away, if they can go to congress at a high level and say that they were doing something wrong, that could be a story.
but that distinction doesn t take you very far because they re not being credibly accused with an nda hanging over an flee would put forward the wrong reason. if one person goes to work and is accused of committing a crime and the other doesn t, that doesn t help that much. final thought? i think you to recognize anyone that worked on stories of women being silenced know that the moment your suggest has been silenced it is really hard to get to publication with them. and that is a fair point that gets to why there is a larger context. if not there is one more story that didn t go to press, thank you to both of you for being here. coming up a rare look inside the sdny trump pro that repped both of the people there you see
and jacob weisberg who has the details on the stormy daniel story basically before anyone. i ll start with probably the easiest question. as a reporter would you be interested in hearing what the rest of this ex-fox news reporter has to stay? i don t think we need congressional hearings to prove that fox news is a propaganda network. i think they would have sue pressed the story, but i doubt they have it in usable form. they are using the story, and i remember them mentions the other reporters that she was talking to, but she took the money from trump instead of going public
and it was clear then that she was going to deny it, and with her evidence not backing it up, it was not sufficient, so she likely did not still have it in a new wansed form. there could be undue pressure or motivation, and a person going between talking to reporters and taking money not to talk to reporters. they always make the point that foxx denies that this was about anything other than the story not being in a reportable fashion and many pointed out that is what other journalists, including yourself, althoughly determined.
j don t why don t we know what the conversation is with putin, why don t we know about the finances and the family involvement in the inauguration. a lot of times we hear these process offenses. lying to congress, lying to a grand jury, lying on statements about the connections overseas and hear. i think the under lying story in the process, which is less complicated to those of us that think of ourselves as lawyers first, is that the story is right there. and the store i have terrible. you mentioned the property that kushner owes so much money and debt on, michelle goldberg, this came up before. some people know this is something they sublet originally from the devil, the dark lord. again with the movie stuff, if it was a movie and they owed on