congress is allowed to review the classified documents found at the homes of both biden and former president trump. he s accusing the administration of stonewalling congress, and in response he says senators will impose pain on the administration until they provide these documents. and that is coming from both parties. it was very unsatisfying. i think i speak for every member of the committee. every member of the committee, regardless of democrat or republican, or unanimous in that this position, that we are left in limbo until somehow a special counsel designates that it s okay for us to get briefings. it s not going to stand. boy, the sharks are circling right now. also tonight, the administration has reversed field and agreed to supply powerful abrams tanks to ukraine, a major policy
more on that later. bipartisan group of senators have had it up here with team biden stonewalling, lawmakers on the intel committee fuming after being denied to classified documents handled by president biden, president trump, and vice president pence, wanting to examine them to see if there s a danger to national security. we re left in limbo until somehow a special counsel designates it s okay for us to get briefed is not going to stand. there was a special counsel involved with the russian investigation, and this committee worked literally for years, . we ve got a job to do, and we ll do it. i think i speak for every member of the committee. the position they ve taken is untenable. until the administration stops stonewalling congress, there will be pain as a consequence for them. brian: mr. t channeling. but no amount of stonewalling can stop other shoes from dropping on the scam.
we ve warned you about its human life responses since it launched two months ago. it passed a wharton business school test, law school exams, and wrote a job application that was better than 80% of the ones humans could do. british researchers are warning their part time that ai could, quote, kill everyone and should be regulated similar to nuclear weapons. that doesn t seem extreme, does it? and congress is keeping an eye on the next steps. left unregulated, unchecked, it can cause harms. we ve already seen the harms it s caused. obviously something we need to pay close attention to. there definitely needs to be oversight. we have to take it seriously. it affects all levels of government and certainly questions of privacy. dana: what really bothers me about that, jesse, by the time they re talking about that, it s too late! it s over! this stuff is going to be here. jesse jr. is going to be utilizing it. we have to figure out a way to
republican president to do this, but it s not okay for the democratic to do this. they made their bed, in a sense, and one of the things that the democrats were yelling about is that the way the republicans were behaving during the impeachment investigations, ukraine and january 6th was that it was emasculating congress power to investigate. they made that bed. now i think they have to lie in it. michael zeldin, we ll leave it there. i m sure we will talk more in the coming weeks. thank you. thanks, fred. all right. we are following new details as the u.s. supreme court investigates the unprecedented breach of court secrecy. who they say was interviewed regarding the leaked draft abortion opinion. that s next. complete balanced n. together we support immune function. supply f fuel for immune cells and sustain tissue health. ensure witith twenty-five vitamins and minerals, and ensure complete with thirty grams of protetein.
protected. i think doj has this exactly right. if congress wants to investigate historic weaponization of the department of justice or the fbi, they want to look at palmer or j. edgar hoover, any of the other prosecutors and fbi directors that weaponized the doj, that s fair game. but not ongoing stuff. so if the house decides, especially after the doj has made that indication, decides to issue subpoenas to the justice department for documents or for information, legally how would it play out? would it be entertained any differently? we saw how it was played out in the trump administration, which is they flat out ignored it, the subpoenas, and congress didn t go to the courts to fight them. in this case, if the executive branch does the same thing that the trump executive branch did and said no thank you, we are not going to honor the subpoenas, congress has the right to go to court to try to