you pillage the earth to get the the materials to build a battery. all f isn t that all fossil fuel related, 90% of it? 907 well, 90%. percent of it is , sean.that but see, democrats wantto gre to convert thaent to green enery and the federal lands they have taken more control over all of these rare earth mineralsl cont and in america and taken irot into federal controlled lands. they don t want you to mine those lands. you they don t want you to mine for minerals. they want to convert us and make us completely dependent companies like countries like chena, which which complet control most of the world s rare earth mineral mines. instead of allowing american hom companies to be able to mine right here at home or just. yeah, no, i mean, i didn t mean to interrupt you. when you see when you run ofh spea aoc in the halls of congress or on the floor of the house, do you ever speak
give you. you gave me..ing yo i am giving you because i like you so much and if i like you s that much i have to give you a name.t you re wrong on everything i give you you know. christ lot no but of course i have the christian you know, i m going to be loved, you and your family. but the question is we got to make sure we got to democracy and a republic god . and , you know, we have an election in twenty eight days and our border is not secure. e we rebo paying the highests price. forty one year high highe inflation towns and cities are t not safe . gangster rides my brother. too much hatred, too much greed, too much hypocrisy. right down to a name i 90% roman empire crossed the rubicon seems to be a sea, but i appreciate that. even though that s justc. our brotherhood and friendship . i got this right. i know that.ev i know thaent. no, no. just save me. save me. but god bless you. stay strong. bless you. when we come back , dr. phild
another, the first one being bill taylor, essentially running the ukraine policy out of the white house since excuse me, for the white house, since they recalled the ambassador. he asked another official in express concern there was going to be a quid pro quo situation happening here into which gordon sondland replied, supposed to testify today, i believe you re correct about the president s intentions saying the president you are incorrect. the president has been crystal clear, no quid pro quos of any kind. that last text came after bill taylor sthaent initial message. someone called to the white house spoke with president trump when president trump told sondland no agreement about the exchange for the military aid over that investigation and when you saw him reply there. it s interesting, because it s giving insight as the would us is trying to dismiss this whistle-blower you see they re own top officials in ukraine were raising concerns about their actions.
but chief justice roberts agreed that the secretary s stated reason, namely enforcing the voting rights act, was a pretext. he says the evidence does not support that and we should therefore send it back to the w is. it s significant that the chief said you have to come up with a real reason, not a fake reason. and we re not going to completely defer to the president on this issue. it would have been as dramatic as the citizens united case if the supreme court by a 5-4 vote republicans against democrats had allowed this question to be presented. the fact that it s not shows chief justice roberts as the institutionalist concerned with the nonpartisan legitimatesy of the court willing to join liberals and conservatives on other issues and holding the balance of power and trying to prevent the court from becoming just as poll hear raisarized in polarized age. the supreme court has sthaent citizenship case back to the lower court in what appears to
answer short answer is no, except he s an expert. what is he an expert in? he s an expert in the russian mafia and the ties, the financial ties between the russians and enemies in the united states in which they re even laundering money or trying to get around sanctions to be able to exchange money. to the sthaent the trump white house sort of across the board challenges the expertise of career civil servants, i do think that bruce is sort of a obvious target. i will say something that susan mentioned about his wife. this is the second time which will donald trump has specifically targeted the wife or targeted the husband of a wife who s had a separate career that the president views as either unbecoming or maybe too women s empowerment. mccabe s wife ran for office. that spun up to a conspiracy so why he was so tied to democrats