about the incalculatable dama if an agreement isn t reached. basally the debate has centered around two different approaches. the first approach says let s live within our means by making serious historic cuts in government spending. let s cut domestic spending to the lowest level it s been since dwight eisenhower was president. let s cut defense spending at the pentagon by hundreds of billions of dollars. let s cut out waste and fraud in health care programs like medicare and make adjustments so medicare is still there for future generations. finally, let s ask the wealthiest americans and biggest corporations to give up some of their breaks in the tax code and special deductions. this balanced approach asks everyone to give a little without requiring anyone to sacrifice too much. it would reduce the deficit by around $4 trillion and put us on a pass to pay downur debt and the cuts would be the be s abruy from helping businesses and families get back on their feet naep app
he was frightened, too. they continued to avoid talking about the war. it was the children emilie s daughter catherine and the lincolns son tad who broke the silence. mary genevieve murphy: she and tad were on the sitting room floor looking at a magazine and tad said. there was a picture of lincoln. he said, oh, here s the president. and catherine said, no, that s not the president; jeff davis is president. and tad jumped up and down and said, no, lincoln is president, hooray for lincoln! and she jumped up and said, hooray for jeff davis! and just. they were about to come to blows and lincoln was standing in the doorway, so he came over with a chuckle and picked them up and put one on one knee and one on the other and said, well, tad, you know who your. your president is and. and as for catherine, i ll just be her uncle lincoln. mccullough: one night emilie and the lincolns were joined for dinner by general dan sickles and the blunt-speaking senator from new york
first from the speaker of the house, john boehner. i would call this plan less an perfect but it doesn t ensure the spending cuts will be greater than the hike and secondly there are no tax increases that are part of the plan. it s not cut cap and balance but it is built on the principles of cut, cap and balance to pass the united states senate as well as the united states house. time s running short. i m urging my house colleagues toupport it and my senate colleagues to support it as well. charlie: then the president went on the air this evening to address the nation and talk about the incalculatable dama if an agreement isn t reached. basally the debate has centered around two different approaches. the first approach says let s live within our means by making serious historic cuts in government spending. let s cut domestic spending to the lowest level it s been since dwight eisenhower was president. let s cut defense spending at the pentagon by hundreds of billions of
toupport it and my senate colleagues to support it as well. charlie: then the president went on the air this evening to address the nation and talk about the incalculatable dama if an agreement isn t reached. basally the debate has centered around two different approaches. the first approach says let s live within our means by making serious historic cuts in government spending. let s cut domestic spending to the lowest level it s been since dwight eisenhower was president. let s cut defense spending at the pentagon by hundreds of billions of dollars. let s cut out waste and fraud in health care programs like medicare and make adjustments so medicare is still there for future generations. finally, let s ask the wealthiest americans and biggest corporations to give up some of their breaks in the tax code and special deductions. this balanced approach asks everyone to give a little without requiring anyone to sacrifice too much. it would reduce the deficit by around $4 tril
if an agreement isn t reached. basally the debate has centered around two different approaches. the first approach says let s live within our means by making serious historic cuts in government spending. let s cut domestic spending to the lowest level it s been since dwight eisenhower was president. let s cut defense spending at the pentagon by hundreds of billions of dollars. let s cut out waste and fraud in health care programs like medicare and make adjustments so medicare is still there for future generations. finally, let s ask the wealthiest americans and biggest corporations to give up some of their breaks in the tax code and special deductions. this balanced approach asks everyone to give a little without requiring anyone to sacrifice too much. it would reduce the deficit by around $4 trillion and put us on a pass to pay downur debt and the cuts would be the be s abruy from helping businesses and families get back on their feet naep approach is also birtisan. while