item 2, case 2014, 0243, 3927 through 3931 19th street. indefinite continuance. under the regular calendar, staff is requesting that item 17 for case number 2015, 00419, 333 12th street, conditional use authorization, to be continued to february 13, 2020. no other items for continuance and no speaker cards. president koppel: any members of the public that would like to comment on the items proposed for continuance? come on up am come on up. hi, my name is tracy thompson. am i to understand we can comment on number one in the regular calendar right now? only to the matter of continuance, not the project itself. so i m confused. well, item 1 no, item 1, under the regular calendar. no we re just taking matters proposed for continuance. when do we speak for when that item is called. thanks, sorry. president koppel: any other members of the public wish to comment on items proposed for continuance, come on up. hello, i want to confirm there is 333 12th
Analyzed. The Planning Department to the board on january 6th, january 3rd go into detail of the appellants arguments. The final eir is complete and objective. On behalf of live nation we request the board uphold and allow the renovations that are needed to modernize. Chiu president david chiu thank you, any questions to the project sponsor. Seeing none, lets hear from the members of the public that support the sponsor. Please lineup. Hello, David Elliot Louis representing myself as a resident aware of this project for some time. And someone who i think i can see from both sides. I urge you to reject the appeal and approve the project. I see this difference between age group, those who want quiet and those who want a nightlife and its also an issue of alcohol. I agree that can be a problem. I do believe that neighbors have a right to quieten enjoyment of their neighborhood but not at the expense of fun, not at the expense of decreasing nightlife. We can use a little more life in that n
Subject to further legal challenge. Not to report the outcome of that allegation. Even if it did analyze in different means that project could have been approved that is not ground for objecting the eir. That is because the eir already analyzed the possibility. On section 2a. Approval for the nonspecial use district to authorize the intensification of a largest affordable nonconforming use. The masonic temple prevail at the appeal at the verdict of mandate. Less the eir already did cover the possibility that an amendment special use district would be necessary however we did prevail at the court of appeal and the final eir actively approved that. The physical impacts on the environment of a project. Not the form of projects approval. The ceqa guidelines to find a project analyzed in the eir in the activity being proposed not the approvals. Therefore even if the appellants are correct, they would have no bearing on the adequacy of the ei r. Let me turn to the section of the 182 argument
Analyzed. The Planning Department to the board on january 6th, january 3rd go into detail of the appellants arguments. The final eir is complete and objective. On behalf of live nation we request the board uphold and allow the renovations that are needed to modernize. Chiu president david chiu thank you, any questions to the project sponsor. Seeing none, lets hear from the members of the public that support the sponsor. Please lineup. Hello, David Elliot Louis representing myself as a resident aware of this project for some time. And someone who i think i can see from both sides. I urge you to reject the appeal and approve the project. I see this difference between age group, those who want quiet and those who want a nightlife and its also an issue of alcohol. I agree that can be a problem. I do believe that neighbors have a right to quieten enjoyment of their neighborhood but not at the expense of fun, not at the expense of decreasing nightlife. We can use a little more life in that n
Code. From an interpretation from the code that was issued several years ago. Special use districts are intended to modify the provisions of the under lining zoning to the extent and only as stated in the provision therefore the under lining zoning prevails. Earlier these same arguments were made in a superior court in the judicial challenge of the 2009 of determination. Once the court of appeal upheld the appeal, that matter was settled, the 2009 letter of determination was upheld in its entirety. On the environmental effects on the renovation project, this eir is comprehensive and thorough. Its 2 inches thick of single space text and covers every environmental issue imaginable in the neighborhood. One of the painstaking detail on traffic transit loading and pedestrian and bicyclist and noise and recreation and public resources, air quality, light and air. Appellants presented no evidence that the physical impacts were not adequately analyzed. The Planning Department to the board on j