it s page 360 and 404 of the house benghazi report and let s read it. i ll read it aloud. the committee s preference for private interviews over public hearings has been questioned. interviews are more efficient and effective means of discovery. interviews allow witnesses to be questioned in depth by a highly prepared member or staff person. the ability to interview witnesses in private allows committees to gather information confidentially and in more depth than is possible under the five minute rule governing committee hearing. has there been anybody asked about their own benghazi report? any of the republicans who stormed the scif today. been shown this report that says do you agree with this then? or do you disagree with it now? well, they should be asked. i can say i tweeted that and got about 2,000 retweets. so that s a good showing. but let s when we re starting to count here, there are about 30 of them that stormed. and it was i saw the line. king was one of them. s
scaramucci, that claimed that he was being investigated for colluding with the russians were dealing with a russian investment fund. cnn and the rest of the destroy trump media have tried to claim all of this as an honest mistake and that cnn did the right thing by retracting the story. according to an explosive story in the new york post, it appears that cnn may have been forced to correctly fake news hippies. cnn faced a $100 million lawsuit over botched russia story. according to the post, cnn quickly retracted the story because, anthony scaramucci threatened a lawsuit. that is not the only time cnn has got a story wrong. in the month of june, the network had to delete a tweet and issue a correction for saying, oh, only democrats were praying before the congressional baseball game. remember after the steve scalis
presents no value to the person holding it. that is the problem we have. that is something we are not talking about. our health care policy right now, i think, over time, is contributing to the decline in health because people are not using health care because it is too expensive. if we are not looking at policy and frankly, i would like to see the federal government back away from trying to organize and orchestrate. i don t think the government has demonstrated very good track record in managing programs. quick question and answer. your whip on earlier this week. he said he believes you are closer to a deal now on health care than when it went down last week. is that the case? you have to talk to steve scalis on that. he has the numbers. you would vote no. you have to be the type of person to say yes. if you don t have appeal, that
health coverage. they are taking steps to under cut the cbo credibility. cost matters. look how often they were last time. if you are looking for cbo for accura accuracy, you are looking in the wrong place. they were way off how they scored and projected obamacare. it will be scored. the idea it is an authority from last time is far fetched. sean spicer is correct. higher enrollment than obamacare reached in the first few years. they overestimated the costs on the same analysis. as house committees begin work, republican steve scalis says he is ready for one score, but won t call unelected bureaucrats slowdown repeal and replace. he cited scores as the reason for opposing other bills. one other note about the cbo.
of my constituents and someone asked me how i voted on the bill, do i have a good answer for them. if they will vote no, they need a reason to take to constituents and say against the ads that will hit them that they did not deliver promise to repeal obamacare. they need a reason to say no. i voted against x. that is the calculation that republicans are making. we don t know how much this is going to cost. the cbo. the non-partisan tool of congress to help them score this stuff is not out yet. we heard from steve scalis. majority whip yesterday in washington calling them unelected bureaucrats. i want you to kocompare that to what he said in 2010. we asked cbo for a score. anybody who thinks we will let some unbureaucratic in washington to stop us from our promise to repeal this failed