If we over turned the appeal what would your process be. Im sorry to uphold the appeal. Overturn the, sir certification all correct. We would act according to whatever the finding the board of supervisors made as to the specific deficiency the eir and take whatever steps would be necessary to bring the Internal Revenue back through certification and bring the project approvals back for reconsideration okay im going to more often and talk about the Economic Feasibility one of the things weve heard consistently this evening and in many neighborhoods merging and id like for you to discuss the Planning Department roll in reviewing the Economic Feasibility analysis provided by the consultant firm. This is the analysis on the alternatives that are analyzed. Thank you so ill start in responding this Economic Feasibility analysis was prepared by the project sponsor not at the behest of the Planning Department the feasibility was not the basis for decisions about the approvals of project or any
Heard the person believes that of flaltd and because it used the present land value instead of the lands use is there any legal stand. Doorstop mirena burns through the president i think i want to address one point and more directly the pot about the land value the first point i want to address is that the alternatives feasibility studies way part of the Planning Commission Decision Making around approving the project the ceqa findings that are discussed were the ceqa approval for the project not the certification finding what is before this board a certification of the eir not the project approval so there is two different slightly different standards for looking at alternatives depend on where youre looking an analysis versus a reservation to a project for the process of approving the project. Maybe i can rephrase are you able to talk about the ceqa appeal before the board and whether or not you doing the presents land value is the appropriate standard. The board is looking at the re
Ceqa findings that are discussed were the ceqa approval for the project not the certification finding what is before this board a certification of the eir not the project approval so there is two different slightly different standards for looking at alternatives depend on where youre looking an analysis versus a reservation to a project for the process of approving the project. Maybe i can rephrase are you able to talk about the ceqa appeal before the board and whether or not you doing the presents land value is the appropriate standard. The board is looking at the reasonable range of feasible alternatives to the projects under consideration like the project approval Decision Maker was the Planning Commission had enough options to look at it and the eir actually did not reject any of the four alternatives discussed as the 3 alternatives discussed rather as imagine feasible it looks like at the potential feasible this metal shed alternative the presentation the reduced density and the n
Them down were valid questions and in some form the commission will be given the role in the dialogue as asked questions this plan can do more than the eastern neighborhood plan shows in the waenlsz . The time to do it right and get into a level of detail it addresses the sublets and may have overlooked things in 10 or 15 years not thought about and the Planning Department will live with the waems and the omissions in the plan we know very well the eastern neighborhoods plan for example, created an amount of resiliency and detail in the plan not matched in any form or shape in the eastern neighborhoods in the neighborhood was a broad policy here we have the opportunities to avoid some of the pitfalls we ultimate now encountering with the eastern neighborhood plan does not give us all the tools with that said i am interested to see how we as a Commission Work between foe and december to have more detailed presentations on part of plan and be more engaged also hearing how you deal with s
From different angles from technical means i believe all questions ive heard and wrote them down were valid questions and in some form the commission will be given the role in the dialogue as asked questions this plan can do more than the eastern neighborhood plan shows in the waenlsz . The time to do it right and get into a level of detail it addresses the sublets and may have overlooked things in 10 or 15 years not thought about and the Planning Department will live with the waems and the omissions in the plan we know very well the eastern neighborhoods plan for example, created an amount of resiliency and detail in the plan not matched in any form or shape in the eastern neighborhoods in the neighborhood was a broad policy here we have the opportunities to avoid some of the pitfalls we ultimate now encountering with the eastern neighborhood plan does not give us all the tools with that said i am interested to see how we as a Commission Work between foe and december to have more deta