now? i would you expect we are at the peak now? ~ , , . ., now? i think big picture, we are caettin now? i think big picture, we are getting very now? i think big picture, we are getting very close now? i think big picture, we are getting very close to now? i think big picture, we are getting very close to peak - now? i think big picture, we are| getting very close to peak range. now? i think big picture, we are - getting very close to peak range. we may see some signs of fine tuning, in terms of where interest rates are topping out. in the case of the us you mention some data that came in today. stepping back, ithink central banks, both at the ecb, and in the us federal reserve, are telling us that, based on the data we have now, they are not expecting a succession of further interest rate rises, and nor, as your clip on the president of the ecb showed, are they signalling a succession of aggressive interest rate cuts on the horizon either. 50 aggressive interest rate cuts on th
decide which documents get used? you see them talking about redactions. how common is? that is that a specific demand they can make? yes, one question would be, when we talked about earlier, would the silent witness rubio so they don t have to be exposed publicly at all? stepping back, from that they would see surgical reductions, potential to remove the most sensitive details from the documents. they re ultimately going to be worried about making sure human sources aren t exposed. i think that s the top priority. that sensitive ongoing collective methods aren t exposed. one thing people have been ignoring, is there s probably a lot of information in those documents that is provided by foreign governments, that, there are probably the number one source of information. we don t want to harm those ongoing relationships because they still provide us some of our most important information. we don t want to not only cut off that human source, but we don t want to cut off that flow of info
people you just showed in interviews there had done any math at all on this question. they just had an answer they were hoping was true. hope isn t a great strategy. that is my thing. stepping back, let s understand why we re in this position. the white house had negotiators that were steeped in the details of the program and really cared about the outcome. when you have both of those, you do better in it a negotiation. i don t think this surprised the white house. they they knew exactly what they were doing when they struck this deal. they got the better of some parts of it. it shows they re preparation and their caring really paid off. just quickly, jason. do you think that the with hindsight is always helpful, do you think the white house should have sat down with kevin mccarthy on this a lot sooner? look, i think it all worked out fine. i think it was a little hard to explain why they were not sitting down with him at an earlier stage. there are arguments on both sides. i wou